Hello Everyone!

I am relatively new to the Mori–Tanaka homogenization method and would appreciate some conceptual guidance.

Most of the literature I have read explains the Mori–Tanaka theory for composites, where an isotropic matrix contains inclusions of a particular shape (e.g., spherical, prolate, or oblate ellipsoids). The effective properties are then expressed using the Eshelby tensor, which accounts for the shape of the inclusion.

What I would like to understand better is the following:

  • Suppose we have an isotropic matrix (for example, a metal hydride powder bed).
  • Into this matrix, we introduce inhomogeneous inclusions, i.e., inclusions that may themselves have anisotropic properties (such as graphite flakes or expanded natural graphite, which have very different in-plane vs through-plane conductivities).

My specific questions are:

  • Conceptually, how is such an inhomogeneous inclusion represented mathematically? Do we treat the inclusion conductivity as a tensor (e.g., diagonal in the principal axes of the inclusion)? If so, how does this couple with the isotropic matrix in the Mori–Tanaka formulation?
  • From the tensor/matrix perspective, how do we form the concentration tensor A\mathbf{A}A and the effective property tensor Keff​? I am comfortable with scalar mixing rules, but not very familiar with tensor algebra. A step-by-step explanation (with matrices written explicitly) would help me connect the concepts.
  • Conceptually, what are the limitations of this approach when the inclusions are strongly anisotropic, or when they form a network instead of remaining as dilute, isolated particles?
  • Any intuitive explanation, along with the mathematical expressions, would be very helpful. References to good learning resources (textbooks or review papers) would also be greatly appreciated

    More Ketan Karkare's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions