Biology / Biochemistry of Bushy
Shunt Virus ?
REF LINK :
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijpg/2009/198680/tab1/
http://www.dpvweb.net/dpv/showdpv.php?dpvno=382
And its not Shunt, its Stunt
Please refer :
Chemical and serological properties of a cyanogen bromide peptide of southern bean mosaic virus protein.
Tomato Bushy Shunt Virus is also applicable . Actually there is a term that Viral
/ Virus Shunt .
Jaydip Datta I don't know how do you read the paper or where did you find "shunt", but even the article you mentioned in the link does not say anything about shunt.
Chemical and serological properties of a cyanogen bromide peptide of southern bean mosaic virus protein
Can J. Microbiol ,1980 ,Dec 26(12) : 1450-9
Where shunt term is mentioned .
Abhijeet Singh I have found this reference very easily by searching Bushy Shunt Virus in Google search engine .
Jaydip Datta This is height of bewilderment and apathy, please read yourself what you are referring to.
Moreover, shunt term is absolutely a mistake where ever it was mentioned and who ever used in any article.
And if you are very interested in shunt, read this - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viral_shunt
Bewilderment and apathy term is a not appropriate to the subject of discussion . Actually any Technical Logic is to be commanded but not demanded . Anyway I am again restoring the term that shunt is also applicable . Tomato bushy shunt virus (TBSV)is a kind of RNA virus .
Ref Link :
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7237270
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijpg/2009/198680/tab1/
Another text book reference in favour of Bushy Shunt Virus .
The Physical Basis of Biochemistry: The Foundations of Molecular Biophysics
By Peter R. Bergethon
Chapter 28 :Flow in chemical Field
Page : 454
Table 28 .1 : Intrinsic Viscosity of Variety of Macromolecules
Not only pubmed you are also
referred to my other ref links
and text book also where shunt
is clearly mentioned .
How a number of ref can be done same mistake .
You are also requested to reaf
other links or text book also .
Sebastian Schmitt
Please leave this matter here and I have done so too. Because people just argue and they just find something on google and claim it is the truth. I wonder how people can be blind that they don't even read and investigate what they are arguing and telling others to do so.Sebastian Schmitt
If you look at the image I posted earlier in discussion, you can see the highlighted text, and if you see the same paper on PubMed, it is mentioned wrong. So, there is nothing to argue about. Still some stupid people think they are right. Same with the other table. And most funny thing is someone is arguing by posting bold text, and not by giving reference papers.
Stupidity , Bewilderment and apathy are not the logical term to impose any research logic . Every Reference including text books , standard article can not be postered in this way directly .Any reference can be cited as just like paper citation .A researcher should have sufficiant maturity to download the referred citation . Any way all arguments are always welcome to build a strong logic . Ph.D thesis also be cited by a proper syntax not by postering the reference directly .
Thanks for reply :
Ref Link :
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=umrlBwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover
https://www.google.com/search?biw=1360&bih=625&tbm=bks&q=inauthor:%22Peter+R.+Bergethon%22&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiw2fz-397hAhWGe30KHZwTBDcQ9AgwA3oECAQQAg
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=umrlBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA454&lpg=PA454&dq=Bushy+Shunt+Virus+%2B+The+Physical+Basis+of+Biochemistry:+The+Foundations+of+Molecular+Biophysics&source=bl&ots=W8uj0iSVVZ&sig=ACfU3U0lp2Um8nThUfX-WZ8-2mq6-7BZWg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiw2fz-397hAhWGe30KHZwTBDcQ6AEwA3oECAQQAQ
https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hindawi.com%2Fjournals%2Fijpg%2F2009%2F198680%2Ftab1%2F
Article Chemical and serological properties of a cyanogen bromide pe...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biology