1. Setting and achieving goals

2.Creating a good environment

3. Working effectively

4. Effective communicator

Thanks for the good topic, I would like to mention some aspects from my view point:

Being Responsible

To be someone who puts in a lot of effort in their duty and are very hardworking. They always make sure they complete their task on time and before the deadline.

Being Trustworthy & Loyal

Someone on whom you could completely rely on and trust them. These people are very honest in their dealings.

Having Ethical Beliefs & Principles

Someone who is honest and deals with high moral and principles is ethical in their dealings.

Being Diligent

They are never easily distracted by what’s happening in the surrounding.

Having Disciplines

As I personally believe that right amount of discipline is the key to just any success, especially in team-work spirits

Being A Complementary Researcher

I also think that if you collect always researchers with same view-points, you will ave probably same results always! to discover more, add on some researchers with different viewpoints as always constructive discussions may always lead to success

Thanks @ Salman for such a nice answar.

In economics that is my expectise research area I think that a good research should have the following basic characteristics:

An analytical framework and hypotheses that describes the topic of the research. Clear presentation of the variables that will be examined. A good research design by applying new economic and econometric methods. Clear results and extended discussion of the empirical findings. The conclusions of the research should generate new questions and give the directions for future research.

Thanks @ Dr.Panagiotis Pegkas ,

Thanks for your reply in economic viewpoint .

Thank you for sharing this discussion.

My answer to this discussion is: a complete set of many, many things!

Following!

Best regards: Julia Doncheva

Thanks Dr. Julia Doncheva , Dr.Nino Durglishvili for continuous inspiration .

Significant reading and referencing of valid data

Welcome dear colleague Jaydip Datta!

Have a good week!

Best regards: Julia Doncheva

Dear Jaydip Datta ,

Great discussion point.

I share what Malini Chaudhri , Julia Doncheva , Panagiotis Pegkas , Salman Keyani Borujeni already said. Besides, I look into one who meets commitments and deadline together, Focused, Honest, and Motivated.

Regards.

1. Setting and achieving goals

2.Creating a good environment

3. Working effectively

4. Effective communicator

Initiative,respect, Acheivement of the goals

1. cooperation

2. helpfulness

3. great knowledge

4. good behavior

1. Scientific and general outlook

2. Know a lot and know a lot

3. Do not spend much time for other work.

i am with what Dmytro Leshchenko said.

A research colleague must complement your own skills, knowledge and abilities. For example you may be good at conducting experiments whereas your partner may be good with analysis or writing. Thus complementary skills create synergy. The second aspect is similarity in attitude, values and goals between you and your colleague. The partner's willingness to share the workload is important since it can lead to frustration along the way if there is a perception that the partner is not pulling their weight.

Creativity / Innovation / Learning Ability / Quality Improvement Activities

Independence / Initiative / Job Knowledge

Leadership / Coaching / Teaching

Productivity / Quantity

Punctuality and Attendance/Quality of Work/Reliability /

Team Work

honesty, innovation, hard working

Understanding ,full co operation, no time bonding, collectively apply efforts for solving complex problem, what negatives are with me my colleague should have expert in that point and vise versa,friendly and respecful relations with colleague

In the field of research our Collogue must be a different thinker against your thought then only you get good and different results which are valuable for society

Expertise, honesty, hard work and commitment, team spirit, self motivation.

Cooperative, expertise, team work encouraging, helpful, creative, scientific skills, honest.

Having advantages I don't have.

Willing to share and highly curious.

Rational discussion and not indiscriminate anger.

Compliance with time and agreement.

Will not be greedy for profit.

thinking then planning then hard working.

Very interesting question!

These are the main criteria:

• It should be clearly defined and common concepts be used.
• A researcher to repeat the research for further advancement, keeping the continuity of what has already been attained.
• The procedural design of the research should be carefully planned
• The researcher should report with complete frankness, flaws in procedural design and estimate their effects upon the findings.
• The validity and reliability of the data should be checked carefully.
• Conclusions should be confined to those justified by the data of the research.
• Greater confidence in research is warranted if the researcher is experienced, has a good reputation in research and is a person of integrity.

Jaydip - Lucky are the persons who get good research colleagues. A research colleague can be a friend, facilitator, guide and collaborator or could make on's life a hell. A good research colleague must be open-minded and also has a critical way of thinking. The colleague shouldn't be dead wood but must be hard working, diligent, focused and devoted to his/her specific field of interest and should be resourceful and updated in knowledge. Besides, the colleagues should be a good human beings.

A research colleague should be honest, hardworking, inquisitive, should have good analytical skills. Should be open minded and easy to discuss with and above all should have the team spirit.

Somebody with impactful contribution, like-minded and goal-targeting in spirit.

My criteria for good research colleague;

- To be compatible

- To comply with the discipline of work

- To be motivated and hard working

- Contribute to the study

- Feeling the excitement of working

.....

The overwhelming number of participants of the discussion list the qualities that, in their opinion, should have a “team member”. But these characteristics, in my opinion, are suitable for members of any group of people doing a common thing - from the crew of the ship, to the gang of criminals (for example, "loyalty"!!!).

Maybe it makes sense to consider the result of the group's work? This is most often an article. If attracting a new member of the group (I deliberately do not use the word "team" because it is too worn out. Often, this is almost a feudal structure in a democratic society, up to the transfer of power "by inheritance." So, it is not a community of specialists solving a common problem, but a rigid structure with an authoritarian type of management) makes the article better, then it is obviously useful, despite the shortcomings that it may have. I already wrote that in a good group, in my opinion, there should be figures of different types - initiator (idea generator), expert on problem (scientific literature), critic (ruthless of course), integrator, developers, specialists in the methods used, inexperienced students who have yet to become masters, etc. Push forward the same demands on all them is at least silly. From my own experience, I can remember how my best articles were written - all the participants argued hotly, sometimes in incorrect forms, but as a result we came to a decision that suited everyone. And in a situation of complete harmony, you do not need to do anything, everything is so good, there are no stimulus for change.

Optimism, creativity, respect, empathy and above all commitment to research with a focus on helping humanity.

The following are some key qualities in ideal research colleague:

1. Knowledgeable

2. Patience.

3. Encouraging and open to both positive and negative feedback.

4. Open minded and Enthusiastic. .

Reading , knowledge , team working

A team of diverse disciplines, discussion and understanding, have the ability to analyze and interpret the results.

Hardworking ,thinks outside the box , adapted to change , essy going

Understand his team.

Following

Able to work as a team regardless of nationality, race, gender, and environment. And use the following

1.Knowledgeable

2.Contribute to the study.

3.Patience.

4. Encouraging and open to both positive and negative feedback.

5. Open minded and Enthusiastic. .

Following .

القراءة والمعرفة والتفاؤل والصبر وروح الفريق

Originality, critical review of existing work to identify gaps, in-depth analysis and verifiable results

Following .

Timely work is done, honest, trusted and creative.