My manuscript, which I sumbit to a journal of Sage in September 2022, passed the Editor stage and was taken for peer review. After 11 months, the referee evaluation was finalised. They rejected it without revision today. The editor said that "Although the reports are generally positive, we are unable to accept your submission for publication. This is due to the sheer volume of submissions we have received over the past few years. As a result, the acceptance rate had to be strongly reduced." There are contradictory statements that I cannot make sense of. How can an article with a "positive report" be rejected without revision after 11 months with the excuse of the acceptance rate of the journal? If they are sensitive to the acceptance rate, why do they take it to peer review and how do they see themselves the right to keep it waiting for 11 months? Isn't it unfair to keep them waiting for 11 months to give a direct rejection?
Despite the positive reports, they only showed me the review text of one referee. Unfortunately, the review of the referee full of contradictions is very superficial and there is not even a concrete argument and criticism. I cannot see the other reviews at all. After 11 months, I am very upset to be rejected with an acceptance rate excuse and an inconsistent referee review. What can I do against this situation? How can I claim my rights? How can I complain about the editor's unfair attitude and approach. I need your help very much. Thank you!
Complaining about an editor is a delicate and challenging task, because you do not want to damage your professional relationship. however, you can do it in a respectful and constructive way.
- Identify the specific issues, contact the editor directly and politely.
- Explain your concerns and provide the evidence you have collected.
- Ask them to explain their editing choices.
- Avoid using accusatory or aggressive language, avoid your emotions and focus on the facts.
- If the editor refuses to cooperate, you can report the issue to a higher authority, such as the editorial board. Provide them with the same evidence that you gave to the editor and request their intervention and assistance.
- If nothing happens, terminate your contract with the editor or find a different editor.
Holding a manuscript for 11months and with a response like that seems unfair. At least return the manuscript to the author after 3months
It is painful for your manuscript to be held for 11 months. But it is a sign that you need to look for another better alternative where you can push your papers to and you will enjoy their services better instead of wasting your time.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Asia
- India