Insightful

If I may please be critical, while this journal appears to have some good attempts to be respectable, it is not yet ready to be a good place for researchers to publish:

1/ The journal is not clear about what types of articles it is publishing and what is supposed to be included in these categories. What is a review article (are there any criteria?) and does research actually include more than a student level paper covering some of the topic and previously published material. What is 'Review Research?'

2/ It does not appear to have proper peer review or even basic science editing (how are species names printed for example).

3/ Most importantly, the journal does not have anyone that has done editing in English or English copy editing and the articles are often not understandable. It is critical that the articles make sense if they are going to be taken seriously by the research community.

Even though it does not have publishing fees, PLEASE do not even consider publishing in this journal until the journal provides quality peer review, clear guidelines on article types (and what must be included), and until there is a qualified editor to make sure the articles are written in quality English and are understandable.

Dear Prof. Robert John Wolff thanks a lot for your Feedback and we really need such a critics to improve this newley launched journal. As you know prof. the journal based in Iraq and we are struggling with many difficulties. I will submit your feedback to the editorial board. Thanks again