If anybody is interested in performing peer review then please do revert with basic details such as name, affiliation, expertise, email, designation etc.
In return, I'll also do the same favor. Please do find my details below.
**Majorly I do never reject any article.
Mr. Atun Roy Choudhury
Scientist- Ramky Enviro Engineers Ltd.
Expertise: Environmental Engineering (Except Air quality engineering)
Email: [email protected]
Total Research Publication: 21
Obviously without peer review how can I include the revision as suggested by
Peers. It will refine the research work .
interested too
Dr. Hassane Eddassi
head of department in the Moroccan Ministry of Finance
areas of expertise: macroeconomics in general, debt sustainability analysis, taxation, fiscal policy, monetary policy...
Yes , I am intrested performing peer review work. Dr. J. M. Koli, Professor. Fish Processing Technology and Microbiology, College of Fisheries, email: [email protected]
Yes I do.
Mohammad Mehdizadeh (PhD in Weed Science)
University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.
Expertise: Weed Science, Pesticides Pollution and Degradation, Environmental Sciences.
Email: [email protected]
Research Publications: 35
Peer review is intetesting and useful for all researchers. It contributes in improving the quality of research.
Yes, Feedback and sharing expertise is an important Thing in real science!
yes, Interested
Click on the following link to Know more about me
https://presidencyuniversity.in/school-of-engineering/civil-engineering-department/dr-jagdish-h-godihal/
Atun Roychoudhury
Yes I would happily accept papers related to organic chemistry and applied areas like biological testing, natural products etc.
Thanks in advance!!
Best, Jose
Peer review is the best suppressing methodology the present system of regimental mainstream science ( such as Quantum theory / General Relativity / Evolution ) has adopted to brush under the carpet almost all alternative methodologies . ..
The next worst thing that the so-called peer review is very well capable of doing is to take away from the community of scientists ( and social scientists) the courageous state of spontaneity that they had in the 19th and early 20th centuries in talking , writing , in doing [ science & humanities ] . .. .. Majority of scientists are nowadays so harshly scrutinized that they are almost always dithering as to what they are going to do and what they are not going to do/say/write .. . . . This has actually led to a very weird bizarre process of self-censoring . ... .
The third Evil of limiting science production to peer-referenced Authority , is that : roughly speaking , no fresh views are to be brought ob the scene . Propounding truly ground-breaking realms of humanities and science have become all but impossible. How would Einstein have put forward his absolutely revolutionary GR in case nobody were having open ears to listen to that and/or preparing room for it to be printed ?? !!
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Asia
- India