With respect to Table V(a) in this paper, why the objectives selected seem to follow this order
{f3, f4, f5}
{f1, f2, f3, f4, f5}
{f4, f5}
when it might be as follows, in descending order according set size
{f1, f2, f3, f4, f5}
{f3, f4, f5}
{f4, f5}
Also, in Section VI.B they mention ¨leading to Fe = {f1, f2, f3, f4, f5}¨, when it might be Fe = {f4, f5} due that is the last set found by Eigenvalue analysis in Table V(a)
Article Objective Reduction in Many-Objective Optimization: Linear a...
I respectfully suggest that the correct approach is to make a courtesy call to the authors. Broadcasting your tentative doubts is not the way to do this, unless you have a very strong reason to believe you understand the problem better than the authors. Just my opinion, and unfortunately not an answer. I look forward to the community response.
Thank you for your answer, I think that you are totally right, I did not think about it before.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Analytical Chemistry
- Extraction