In my study, I prepared herbal teas using plant samples that were:

  • Fresh (control)
  • Shade-dried
  • Microwave-dried at 360W and 600W

Teas were prepared in distilled water via maceration for 8 hours, and antioxidant activity was measured using the DPPH method. Results:

  • Fresh: 35.16% inhibition
  • Shade-dried: 11.54%
  • Microwave 360W: 82.30%
  • Microwave 600W: 84.17%

Since shade-dried and microwave-dried samples showed significant differences, I conducted additional analyses:

  • Anatomical sections: Microscopy revealed collapsed and deformed parenchyma cells in microwave-dried samples, while cells in fresh and shade-dried samples remained intact.
  • Browning Index (BI) and Fermentation Index (FI): Shade-dried: BI = 1.2625, FI = 1.3715 360W: BI = 2.1125, FI = 1.1492 600W: BI = 2.1800, FI = 1.1668
  • Do you think these anatomical and biochemical analyses are sufficient to explain the observed differences in antioxidant activity (DPPH inhibition)? Would you recommend any other supportive analyses to further validate the interpretation?

    Thank you in advance for your valuable feedback.

    More Avni Yildizbaş's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions