“This is not true and if it is true I don’t believe it” is how everyone responds.
For everyone approves of CERN’s nonrenewal of its planetary safety report LSAG for ten years. The fact that CERN uses open fraud in hiding this non-renewal from the public (CERNGATE) only adds to its credence.
All parents are betting the lives of their children against the young Einstein and the old Rossler. Did anyone ever live in a more interesting time? I am the only friend of every living child. Do forgive me for my feeble voice, my young friends!
April 24, 2018
P.S.: To those who like to understand in more detail: My results are really a bit unbelievable at first sight because they are “too big.” That is, the young Einstein’s retrieved c-global implies, in addition to CERNGATE uncovered, also that
- Hawking was wrong, and that
- there is no Big Bang, and that
- there are no gravitational waves –
three things that everyone “knows” are true. For it appears unlikely that a single result, even if of Einstein vintage, can be that maximally powerful. Therefore it is perhaps an excellent idea to bet your children’s lives against it?
P.S. II: Young people who read this may feel the fresh wind opened-up by c-global – even if no thesis advisor and no journal editor and no funding agency approves of their joining-in. The future, the future is on your side! (Heinrich Heine)
Dear Otto
I really like to face the problem, but there are so prerequisites which are required to start the investigation. if any, it would be appreciated if you share them with me.
i think to solve a big problem, just like this, we need step-wise proofs, reasonable assumptions, understandable questions and finally, attainable tests. i really don't know how much of these works have been done, but I know you know. i read about your and what happened to you and your family due to your idea about CREN and its related issues.
No matter for me if you are right or not, but i think it is time to finalize the problem. there are many physicists around the world which are more valid to check it but i think they may investigate the problem using their biased mined.
at the end:
i am ready to deal with problem and hope you can help me, step by step, just as you did in university for you students many years. if you are interested please inform em to set up the framework of that.
Thank you
Best Regards
Ahmad
Dear Ahmad:
You are the first who takes my efforts to alert the scientific community to the Cern problem -- the name CERNGATE is certainly incomprehensible and implausible at first sight -- seriously.
The most important reference no doubt is the (scientifically highly learned) LSAG itself: http://lsag.web.cern.ch/lsag/lsag-report.pdf
It carries no date. To verify that it is unchanged since early 2008 will require a journalist to be versed in opening-up previous versions of the Internet.
Secondly, you probably need my earliest detailed publication on the topic of CERN safety. It was written in 2007 and is on the web since 2008 after it was accepted for publication. It appeared eventually in 2012 because the editor for some reason found himself forced to found a new journal. The preprint is Article Abraham-like return to constant c in general relativit y: "ℜ...
(the many R's being a misprint). The publication (with one word added) is: Rossler O. E., Abraham-like return to constant c in general relativity: Gothic-R theorem demonstrated in Schwarzschild metric. Fractal Spacetime and Noncommutative Geometry in Quantum and High Energy Physics 2, 1-14 (2012).A fairly recent paper of mine is http://www.ptep-online.com/2015/PP-43-09.PDF
Now I am waiting for your next guidance.
Take care,
Otto
Dear Otto
Lets start to see what will happen.
i need time to read these materials. I will inform you about it....
Thank you again
Ahmad
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publication