Hi guys,
I noticed that fwd modelling is not available yet. Is this something you are looking to implement in the future?
Also, I noticed that I could not create a mesh for a 3D survey that has electrodes on the surface (2 lines) and in boreholes (6). The other steps look ok, so I'm assuming the problem is with the position of the electrodes, rather than anything else. In the event that I am right, is this also something you are going to implement in the future? If electrodes in boreholes are something already supported by the 3D inversion, could you think of anything I'm missing here?
Thanks
Bruna de Carvalho Faria Lima Lopes We are working to make 3D forward modeling available in the GUI as well. It currently only works using the API.
Thanks for noticing the issue with 3D borehole arrays, this is actually a bug! I just fixed it, which would be reflected in the next release, where you certainly can have combination of surface and borehole electrodes for a 3D inversion.
Hi,
I suggest you to see links and attached files on topic.
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:472017/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Article Geoelectrical monitoring of simulated subsurface leakage to ...
Best regards
Thanks Sina Saneiyan I´m looking forward to the updates.
Thank you for your suggestions Mohamed-Mourad Lafifi but I prefer to keep working with ResIPy API while the guys work on the GUI.
I don't have an opinion about BERT, never tried it. But I did not had a good experience with DCIP2D&3D. Everything was difficult, from getting the academic license, to working with the codes and getting in touch with the guys at UBC. I did not like it, and would not go back.
Cheers.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Modeling