It is a good question indeed. I think resource depletion will force all parties to apply the principals of sustainable management of natural resources. A variety of motivations, economic, political and evevn social, will act together to maintain at least a reseonable level of healthy environment for human living. Finally we should not ignore the ability of nature itself to protect its existence regardless of human absurdism .

Notably, the enhancement of environmental, social and economic resources constitute critical needs of current and future generations. Such needs can satisfactorily be satisfied by Green Economy that describes the logical pathways to sustainable development. Evidently, ecologically effective economic development can lift us out of the present situation to a new, green economy whose main goal is to break the cycle of poverty while respecting and repairing the natural environment.

Green economy "... will not help in solving the crises of the era of environmental and financial, nor the crisis of poverty and unemployment, as it does not address the treatment of the global economy is dominant and responsible for the successive global crises.

Hopefully. There is a whole lot of green innovations. I think bottom up approach is more effective than the opposite.

Sadly I do not think that mankind throughout the world would manage or be capable to develop a globally sustainable pro-ecological economic development based on the concept of green economy. The world is already overpopulated. In any ecosystem this over-population and over-consumption would lead to demise of the species. It may be that the worlds human population may have to at least halve for the planet to survive. We have entered critical phase of global warming and loss of biodiversity. It's a very sad reality, I fear. I'm not optimistic for the survival of planet Earth as we know it. We have lived in a golden age, it can't go on for generations.

To say that the green economy will stop the devastation is not possible but the green economy will improve much poorly used lands, revitalise the unused lands and generally provide a more eco-friendly surrounding that will reduce devastation . This needs to be consistent and continuous to reach levels where impact is obvious. The future of Arabia is to transform from a desert to a green valley and this is traditionally, orally spoken among people of those and other countries where same inhabitants which migrated actually live. That transformation is the green economy effect. Something is already green there that used to be a desert. Many people are happier and healthier there compared to years ago. Why cant it be done elsewhere? Hope lives forever and we work for it with belief that change is going to be green. :)

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

How to increase the effectiveness of environmental protection programs, natural ecosystems and biodiversity?

Protection of the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity should be an integral part of the concept of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?

In the context of growing and increasing environmental pollution and declining areas of natural ecosystems, the importance and need to improve environmental protection systems, natural ecosystems and biodiversity is increasing. Biodiversity is one of the most important issues of natural ecosystems and life on Earth. Maintaining high biodiversity on Earth should be a challenge and one of the main goals of human functioning on the Earth in the 21st century and in subsequent centuries.

In connection with the above, protection of the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity should be an integral part of the concept of sustainable ecological development. In some countries, the concept of sustainable pro-ecological economic development is implemented successively, primarily in the field of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation techniques and recycling development. However, in many countries these issues are still insufficiently developed.

Still too small financial resources are allocated in many countries for the development of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation and recycling techniques. In addition to the private sector, besides enterprises implementing ecological innovations, it is necessary to increase expenditures and develop strategic pro-ecological reform projects, including restructuring of the mining industry of minerals supplying classic energy sources and development of energy based on renewable energy sources. This development should be supported and coordinated by environmentally friendly state intervention, and due to the high investment costs of construction of power plants producing electricity from renewable energy sources should be co-financed from the state public finance funds.

In this way, it will be possible to slow down the ongoing global warming process in the 21st century and thus slow down the process of devastating the natural environment, draining green areas characterized by high biodiversity. Biodiversity is a very important issue in the context of the analysis of ecology, sustainable development and the protection of the natural environment, including, in particular, the natural positions of biologically complex ecosystems, i.e. those that are characterized by high biodiversity. Maintaining biodiversity of natural ecosystems is one of the most important problems and tasks for people in the 21st century.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is still valid:

How to increase the effectiveness of environmental protection programs, natural ecosystems and biodiversity?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

What do you think is the importance of biodiversity in natural ecosystems?

Biodiversity is diverse in virtually unlimited degree, which results from the essence of processes of evolution of species, filet lines and entire ecosystems. It is thanks to the millions of years of evolutionary processes on Earth that there are so many different natural and highly diverse ecosystems in which different species of flora, fauna, fungi and microorganisms adapt to life in different and very diverse geographical and climatic environments.

The largest biodiversity of ecosystems and species functions in natural environmental environments in which ecosystems have evolved without human impact through millions of years of climatic and geographical conditions enabling the development of various life forms. These types of high biodiversity sites can be found in unpolluted rainforest ecosystems in tropical forests, in temperate climates and in coral reefs.

Unfortunately, human civilization activity contributes to the successive and accelerating process of biodiversity reduction by dying out species of living organisms. The areas of natural natural ecosystems are decreasing, including those in which the greatest biodiversity is diagnosed, such as the rainforests of the Amazon. The protection of naturalistic ecosystems and thus the protection of the planet's biodiversity is the most important challenge for mankind in the 21st century.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

What do you think is the importance of biodiversity in natural ecosystems?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes