Has anyone seen such a behavior before? Please share some references.

I think the possible reason may be due the pore plugging of the support by the active metal, which causes increase in surface area. I found that BET of support show macropores (50-200nm) and Micropores (0.5-2nm) but final catalyst show only microporous. Which phenomena causes an increase in surface area of the final catalyst, compared to the bare support BET.

More Muhammad Usman's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions