Has anyone seen such a behavior before? Please share some references.
I think the possible reason may be due the pore plugging of the support by the active metal, which causes increase in surface area. I found that BET of support show macropores (50-200nm) and Micropores (0.5-2nm) but final catalyst show only microporous. Which phenomena causes an increase in surface area of the final catalyst, compared to the bare support BET.