Why is hierarchical clustering the preferred clustering choice for gene expression?

Gene expression data often exhibits a hierarchical structure. Genes that share similar expression patterns tend to group together, forming clusters at multiple levels of the hierarchy. Hierarchical clustering methods can effectively capture this structure, allowing for the identification of genes that function together or have similar roles in biological processes. Moreover, Hierarchical clustering results can be represented as dendrograms, which provide a visual representation of the clustering structure. Dendrograms help researchers quickly understand the relationships among genes and the hierarchy of gene clusters. This visual aspect is particularly valuable in biological research, as it aids in the interpretation of results.

Shekoofeh Momahhed

Hierarchical clustering is a favored technique for the analysis of gene expression data, primarily owing to its inherent attributes that align with the complexities and nuances of genetic data analysis. The selection of hierarchical clustering is informed by the following compelling considerations:

Exploratory Data Examination: Gene expression datasets are typified by their high dimensionality, encompassing a multitude of genes and samples. Hierarchical clustering offers an invaluable visual framework for data exploration, enabling the discernment of latent patterns and relationships within the data. Through the construction of a dendrogram, hierarchical clustering unveils clusters of genes with akin expression profiles, facilitating the identification of underlying structures.

Hierarchical Structure: One of its distinguishing features is the creation of a hierarchical structure, manifested in the form of a dendrogram. This hierarchical representation is instrumental in revealing relationships across different levels of granularity, allowing researchers to explore both broad and fine-grained insights within the data. Researchers can choose an appropriate level of clustering granularity that aligns with their analytical objectives.

No A Priori Assumptions on Cluster Number: In contrast to methodologies such as k-means clustering, hierarchical clustering liberates analysts from the obligation of predefining the number of clusters. This is particularly pertinent when dealing with gene expression data, where the optimal number of clusters might be elusive, and the data may exhibit intricate patterns that are not readily quantifiable in advance.

Robustness to Noise and Outliers: Gene expression datasets are often plagued by noise and the presence of outlier data points. Hierarchical clustering excels in its ability to accommodate noisy data by aggregating genes or samples with analogous expression patterns, thus allowing the identification of potential outliers or sources of variation.

Interpretability: Hierarchical clustering yields results that are intuitive and interpretable. Researchers can readily discern how genes or samples are grouped together, and this transparency aids in attributing biological significance to the ascertained clusters, leveraging domain knowledge.

Agglomerative and Divisive Strategies: Hierarchical clustering provides the flexibility to employ either an agglomerative (bottom-up) or divisive (top-down) approach. The agglomerative approach progressively fuses individual genes or samples into larger clusters, which is conducive to the exploration of similarities. Conversely, the divisive approach successively partitions the dataset into smaller clusters, a capability that is instrumental in segregating datasets into distinct subsets.

Diverse Distance Metrics: Hierarchical clustering permits the utilization of a diverse array of distance metrics (e.g., Euclidean distance, Pearson correlation) to quantify dissimilarity between genes or samples. This versatility empowers the customization of clustering based on the intrinsic characteristics of the gene expression data.

Heatmap Integration: Hierarchical clustering is frequently combined with heatmaps to visually represent the expression profiles of genes across different samples. Heatmaps offer an accessible visualization method that allows for the rapid identification of expression patterns and distinctions.

Is FT-IR usefull to comparte 3D printed PETG samples?

Would anyone use anticoagulation after an arterial reconstruction in Whipple?

How do i measure confirmation bias (degree in which a message confirms prior beliefs) in credibility judgement of fake news messages?

Blowerdoor test with SimFlow?

Appropriate lysis buffer for immunoprecipitation?

Slower migration on SDS-page in complex sample?

BCA assay my sample is coloured?

Secondary antibody gives same signal as primary?

Western blot on immunoprecipitation eluate detects related protein?

QPCR spike in normalization?

How to learn more about SPSS and its Application?

Can I base on reverse DNA sequences to perform alignment, convert to amino acids and GenBank submission?

Baseline drift in HPLC? What causes this?

Text-Communication from the M1 Hand Area using BCI—and then there is Elon Musk?

Has anyone applied Python in the field of textile engineering for data analysis, automation, or smart textiles?

How can I use the cif data obtained from rietveld refinement extracted via gsas2, for microstructural analysis using ETEX software?

How are iso-frequency contours plotted?

How to prepare the nanoparticle treated fungal sample for Environmental SEM analysis?

How to normalize and take the significance of the MTT OD values with 3 replicates for the same cell-line?

Why does my protein refolded to beta sheet during thermal denaturation analysis?