I think that this question can only answered by Theology. For example God would have the human as opposite person to have connexion with him. God loves the human. He had give His@ Sohn Jesus Christ as offering for our sin at the cross of Golgatha.

I discussed this also with AI intensivly and we came to the Point that one must logically decide for one of both 1st axioms.

1 life was caused by the universe

2 universe was / is caused by life.

AI Said First WE cannot decide as WE cant know, then i Said empirical science ist only possible If WE decide. The AI choosed 2 as universal axiom, as IT IS much more consistent with and logical.

Dear M.U.E. Pohl,

Your discussed is good. I understand your way to explain. However, please let me know the result of your argumentation.

With Best Regards,

Friedhelm Jöge

Dear Friedhelm Manfred Jöge , i asked the AI to summarize our discussion about the logical proof of god we worked out. (It also reflects on the connections beween theoretical physics and theology.)

I uploaded the file here:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15646732

A Logical Proof of God: The Living Universe as the

Necessary Axiom and the Circularity of Physical

Units

Best regards

Manfred Pohl

Please see the contributions of Prof. Dr. Christoph Benzmüller from the University Bamberg (Germany).

Further my article "Physical-Mathematical Proof of God", in publication process of "Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research", DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2025.62.009690 ; BJSTR. MS.ID.009690

The regarding manuscript I will publish in this forum.

Thanks for pointing at the work of Prof. Benzmüller. I look forward to read your article "Physical-Mathematical Proof of God".

see my attached article "Physical-Mathematical Proof of God"

At attempts to consider/clarify really scientifically the threaf question “Why does life exist in the universe? Seeking multidisciplinary perspectives?”

- all in this

“....I welcome insights from:

Physics/Cosmology: Anthropic principle, fine-tuning, or quantum necessity

Thermodynamics: Life as a driver of entropy production

Philosophy: Teleological or existential views

Quantum Biology: Life as a bridge between information, vibration, and matter....”

- is fundamentally non-applicable, since relates only to Matter, while consciousness fundamentally differs from Matter and any matter structure/construction. Including, say, Matter and any consciousness exist and evolve/operate in different spaces, which only very partially interact.

In consciousness – and so in “Life” since living beings are as they are just pnly because of all they have soem consciousnesses; though more correctly that the consciousnesses have living beings practically nmateriaal organisms, using the organisms only as stable residences, power supply, and some auxiliary functions at operation,

- there are no any “quantum necessity”, “thermodynamics”, and, of course, any strange “entropy production”, “quantum orchestra”, etc.

Though all that above really well exists and popular in mainstream philosophy and sciences, including biosciences and phycology, however these strange transcendent mental constrictions exist completely logically inevitably because of that in the mainstream philosophy and sciences, including the above and physics, all really fundamental phenomena/notions, first of all in this case “Matter”, “Consciousness”, “Space”, “Time”, “Energy”, “Information”, are fundamentally completely transcendent/uncertain/irrational - while really by humans they all can be scientifically defined only together

So in every case when the mainstream addresses to any really fundamental problem, the result is completely inevitably is transcendent/mystic something - as that is in the quote above.

The fundamental phenomena/notions above can be, and are, really rigorously scientifically defined only in the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s really philosophical 2007 “The Information as Absolute” conception, recent version of the basic paper see

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363645560_The_Information_as_Absolute_-_2022_ed

Compact, but essentially clear and rather in detail introduction in the conception see in

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387933457_A_response_to_question_What_is_the_The_Information_as_Absolute_conception

So more about what are “Matter”, “Consciousness”, “Life” see the first linked paper, at least section 7; a first approximation functional “consciousness on Earth” version, including version “human’s consciousness”, model see in https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329539892_The_Information_as_Absolute_conception_the_consciousness

Cheers

Dear Friedhelm Manfred Jöge Sorry for responding so late. I just received an email about your post.

I agree with your proof. Fundamentally, however, my work goes beyond trying to be a proof of God's existence; it's about better describing the "nature" of God and his understanding his commandments, and translating the Bible into modern language.

From my proof follow: God does not only created, but also still active participate (create).

It all has a meaning. For example, the 12 apostles, the 12 foundations in prophecy, etc., are mathematically and geometrically motivated. 1/12 is the smallest angle with which a circle can be divided into pieces whose sine results in a rational number (1/2). 1/12 is therefore essential as a "divisor" for practicing astronomy so that one can read the "will of God" in the stars.

I think the Pythagoras knew this back then. People today don't seem to have this knowledge anymore

and have to wait for the return of Jesus so that he can explain it again, so to speak.

Best regards

M Pohl

Dear M.U.E. Pohl,

your work that tell me above is very good.

With Best Regards,

Friedhelm Jöge

The thread question is rigorously scientifically answered in SS post on page 1; though here add that recent SS post in https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-could-be-proof-of-consciousness#view=6864f009df2e89631503914f/360 page 360 , and links in the post,

- are relevant in this case.

Cheers