Figure 1：

① First, by inputting hourly wind speed and tidal level data for a specific location over the course of a month into the model, I simulated the hourly wave heights. However, the model initially produced wave heights that were significantly higher than the observed values. Therefore, I would like to ask which parameters can be adjusted to fine-tune the model locally?

②Since one set of parameters cannot be applied to the entire calibration period, how can suitable calibration data and periods be selected? What factors should be considered to ensure the safety and reasonableness of the design wave height for the project?

③During calibration, is it possible to use different model parameters for different situations?

Figure 2：

④After that, I used wind field data from the ERA5 database, processed it into a DFS2 file, and applied the model to the site. However, the model results were very unreasonable, showing wave heights only during periods of high wind speed. What is the reason for this?

⑤Finally, when there is a situation where the model calibration results are good but the design wave height is excessively high, how should this generally be handled? How can the reasonableness of the design wave height be assessed?