When submitting a research to one of Scopus or Clarevit or Thomson Reuter magazines, the journal is delayed in informing the researcher that it has received the research, while any other journal gives immediate notice of receipt of the research, sending it for evaluation and their commitment to dates that render the researcher impossible to wait.
Does this make Scopus and Clarevit magazines desirable for the researcher?
I think in my opinion because our research is pure, while today all aspect life need in applied research because these has a lot of benefit in our live .@
When we talk about Scopus indexed or Thomson Reuters journals it will take time to analyze the quality of research and they done it by peer review. Peer reviews take time varies from 6 to 8 weeks. While other journals give the exact date of publication, they might not go for a peer review. So for ensuring the quality of research they take time form 3 to 6 months to respond. And second thing is that these journals have huge quantity of research article to process, so again for that time is required. So it's a request to the researchers to have some patience, they will definitely get a reply from the publisher.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Media
- Journalism