I've found that some journals are both Scopus-indexed and listed on Beall's list as predatory or potentially predatory. Why does this discrepancy occur?
Are there any more reliable platforms than Beall's List for identifying predatory journals?
Scopus is a comprehensive, multidisciplinary database of peer-reviewed literature, including scientific journals, books, and conference proceedings. Launched by Elsevier in 2004, it provides access to a wide array of academic papers and research across various fields. Scopus is known for its extensive coverage and includes features such as citation analysis and author profiles, making it a valuable tool for researchers, academics, and institutions to track and evaluate research output and impact.
Beall's Dilemma
Beall's dilemma refers to the controversy and challenges surrounding predatory publishing, a term popularized by Jeffrey Beall, a librarian and scholar who created Beall's List. This list identified potentially predatory open-access publishers and journals that exploit authors by charging high publication fees without providing the editorial and publishing services associated with legitimate journals. These predatory publishers often lack proper peer review and editorial oversight, leading to concerns about the quality and integrity of the research they publish.
Beall's List was both praised and criticized. Supporters appreciated the efforts to expose unethical publishing practices, while critics argued that the criteria for inclusion were sometimes subjective and that the list could unfairly damage the reputations of legitimate publishers. In 2017, Beall's List was taken offline, but the issue of predatory publishing remains a significant concern in the academic community.
The Connection Between Scopus and Beall's Dilemma
Scopus aims to maintain a high standard for the journals it indexes, but it has faced scrutiny over occasionally including journals from publishers considered predatory or questionable, as identified by Beall's List. This situation creates a dilemma: researchers rely on Scopus for credible sources, yet the presence of potentially predatory journals can undermine trust in the database. Ensuring the quality and reliability of indexed journals while avoiding the pitfalls of predatory publishing is an ongoing challenge for Scopus and other similar databases.