Those sites are great. You can also see about prevention and prediciton of state failure from conflict: http://www.cfr.org/thinktank/cpa/ (i recommend the subgroup: http://www.cfr.org/global/global-conflict-tracker/p32137#!/) and http://library.fundforpeace.org/fsi.
Of course the WHO, WB and Kaiser (http://kff.org/globaldata/) offer the best for clinical details from conflict.
I have found the attached article to provide an extremely helpful overview of relevant approaches from within the Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) sub-field of IR. The article describes actor general and comparative theoretical approaches as more typical of the Cold War era and actor specific approaches as more contemporary -- and their combination as resonant with the Perestroika turn. To summarize:
Actor general & Cold War/classical FPA era approaches described:
Comparative Foreign Policy (CFP) unified theoretical measurement tools -- including FEWAMS (Early Warning and Monitoring System), CASCON (Computer-Aided Systems for Handling Information on Local Conflicts), CACIS (Computer-Aided Conflict Information System), and XAIDS (Crisis Management Executive Decision Aids)
* Events Data sets used: DDIR [Data Development for InternationalResearch] Project of the NSF), WEIS (the World Event/Interaction Survey), COPDAB, CREON (Comparative Research on the Events of Nations)
*The paper describes the four most ambitious integrated multilevel projects as being those of Michael Brecher and his associates of the IBA Project -- of DON, of CREON, and of Harold Guetzkow’s INS. It also discusses, in the context of the classic FPA era, approaches associated with: operation code frameworks, orientation and leader behaviour analysis, perception and images, national role perception, bounded rationality, culture and socialization.
Actor Specific -- Contemporary FPA era described:
As prioritizing: process tracing, content analysis, agent-based computational models and simulations, culture analysis, decision making, leader characteristics, culture and identity, national role perception, methodology, and integration.
I am interested in exploring situated agency (as a driver of cultural practice) as explanans -- I am working within an anti-foundationalist theoretical framework and hence privileging qualitative techniques for analysis.