While «hair growth» is an extremely popular item. On February 12, 2013, there were

61,600,000 hits via Google and there were 70,400,000 hits on July 11, 2013?

The interest grows on the web as the number of citations has increased over 13% in less than half a year). The claims on improving growth are quite numerous and barely documented. In contrast, the evidence based information about human hair growth in terms of «dynamics of hair fibre elongation over time» remains surprisingly rare if not completely dismissed in the adverts with a smell of trichoquackery....

Who think that I was right in trying to alert the scientific community about extremenly fats augmentation of HITS containing distorted and pseudo-information on the web?

By analogy marketing ads tell you that "shoe-shine nurters your shoes"...?

More Van Neste Dominique's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions