01 January 1970 2 9K Report

Dear experts,

I have been writing a paper about language teacher identity, and I adopted Wenger's three modes of belonging (Engagement, Imagination, and Aligment) as my theoretical and conceptual framework. However, I feel confused about Wenger's thoughts in defining those constructs as they did not specify the issue of HOW. Like, how engagement works in exploring language teacher identity; how imagination informs LTI, and how alignment works with LTI. From my POV, I think what Wenger describes is general, not give too much detail about HOW to understand those aspects.

Can anyone who is expert in SLA sheds some light here?

Thanks.

Similar questions and discussions