All will be depend on your aims - what genome you interested in (nuclear, cp or mt) and what plants you work - live or extinct. But generally the next tisseus are prefered to use - apical and lateral meristems and live vegetative tissues. As for parts you may use buds, kambium, leaves, flowers, seeds and so on. For some studies pollen is also good to use.
Except aims of the research in case of choise tissue are some general critical factors: 1) tissue availability 2) quantity of integer DNA of genome you interested in this tissue 3) quantity of specific secondary metabolites which can affect to DNA isolation.
Another cruical moment - the choise of most suitable technique or kit for DNA isolation for your own aims.
All will be depend on your aims - what genome you interested in (nuclear, cp or mt) and what plants you work - live or extinct. But generally the next tisseus are prefered to use - apical and lateral meristems and live vegetative tissues. As for parts you may use buds, kambium, leaves, flowers, seeds and so on. For some studies pollen is also good to use.
Except aims of the research in case of choise tissue are some general critical factors: 1) tissue availability 2) quantity of integer DNA of genome you interested in this tissue 3) quantity of specific secondary metabolites which can affect to DNA isolation.
Another cruical moment - the choise of most suitable technique or kit for DNA isolation for your own aims.
@Peyman Habibi: Even when the desired gene is expressing only in roots, the genomic DNA isolation from any part will include that gene in the genome. The question is not about RNA expression, but about DNA isolation.
Leaves. They contain big and elongated cells with huge vacuoles, that are easy to break. Meristem cells are harder to break, as they are smaller and more compact.
young tender leaves will be best for isolating the genomic DNA because the number of cells per unit area will be more and it may contain less un wanted secondary metabolites and phenolic compounds
I think young leaves, because this part is more quiker grinded than other part of the plant and then, you profit by experiment time, if quality of DNA don't take into account. But, leaves shape and compunds (resin etc.) is always effective for reach to DNA.
Depend on what kind of plants are you working on! For Arabidopsis or any plant that has umbelliform or corymbose inflorescence, I would suggest you to use newly grown buds. They are very good source of DNA. Otherwise, very young green leaves could be used for DNA extraction. For poaceae family plants take special care in extracting the DNA from leaves as they have silica deposits at the abaxial side of the leaves.
As Laxmikanta said: Young leaves are often preferred for nuclear DNA (genomic DNA), but also for plastid DNA. You have a high number of cells per weight, but very little vacuole content, meaning a high ratio of DNA/water content, and low content of secondary (especially phenolic) metabolites, which may disturb extraction, and low chlorophyll content. Easiest for many plants is to grow from seeds and take young leaves from young plants only a few days old.
It will depend on what you want to do with the isolated DNA and what plant you are using. For example cauliflower florets are eaxy to handle and that is why we demonstrate using this for undergraduate students.
it is depend on your plant leaf part is choose for DNA isolation, and suitable method to select for DNA isolation is important and finally handling is important
Some parts of the plant (woody stems) are not preferred as they are more difficult to grind than softer tissues. Roots are not a common choice due to soil contamination. Tissues containing high amounts of starch (tubers, many seeds) or secondary metaboliites are generally challenging to extract from.
If you are going to isolate the genomic DNA of plants then i also suggest young and tender leaves reasons have already provided by other Researchers. I also recommend CTAB method for DNA isolation.
I received an email from Promega about this issue so check this link for a browser version of the email so subscribe to a webinar about this issue (from Promega).
Young tissues (leaves, buds) in full expansion have obviously many copies of DNA molecules. The problem occurs with wooden parts (from tree trunk or branches). According to our experience, cp and mtDNA are well preserved (in many copies) in almost any wood-tissue but the genomic DNA is better extracted from sapwood than from heartwood.
I agree with my partners above, If I have plenty tissues to choose, I'd choose always young leaves or meristems and soft parts of the plant. easy to powder and high number of cell per area.
Use leaves as you need quantity since leaf forms larger surface area ,other wise use meristamatic regions such as shoot leaves (contains soft tissue portion of the plant )
In my lab we also extract DNA from a leves of the plants that are nearly 3 weeks old. If you use chloroform assay the concentrations should be very high, up to 450 ng/micro liter.
It is better to use fresh and young leaves for extraction DNA because the disruption of cell walls it is easy, these leaves are not lignified (or not contained secondary metabolites) and you can obtained a high quantity of DNA.
Young tender tissues are without the doubt the best, but even wooden part of plants are prone to DNA isolation - it is just the matter of the chosen method of extraction.