Google scholar presents citation indices as total citation, H-index and i10 indices. Which one is considered most important in the field of academics.Will any body explain how H-index and i10 index are calculated.
Dear Dr. Hom Nath Chalise , it is an interesting issue and I am voting for H-index. Here are some facts about H-index.
H-index is the most commonly applied tool to evaluate scientific productivity (Diaz et al. 2016).
The h index bibliometric indicator for evaluating scientists and scientific institutions plays an increasingly important role in evaluating contemporary scientific research, including chemistry (Ciriminna et al. 2013).
H-index has had a deep impact on the quantification of the productivity of researchers ( Marc André Meyers and Haocheng Quan, 2017 ).
The h-index, or Hirsch index, measures the impact of a particular scientist rather than a journal ( Michael Schreiber, 2008).
I see the h-index in the peer reviewed literature more often than i-10 or total citation counts. David Hodge of Arizona State has some decent research in this area.
The metric that relies on Google Scholar's data is not a reliable source for academic quality since it considers many data types that are not always academic.The H-Index and the 5 years citation windows of the World of Science are more reliable for judging academic quality.
Dear Dr. Hom Nath Chalise , it is an interesting issue and I am voting for H-index. Here are some facts about H-index.
H-index is the most commonly applied tool to evaluate scientific productivity (Diaz et al. 2016).
The h index bibliometric indicator for evaluating scientists and scientific institutions plays an increasingly important role in evaluating contemporary scientific research, including chemistry (Ciriminna et al. 2013).
H-index has had a deep impact on the quantification of the productivity of researchers ( Marc André Meyers and Haocheng Quan, 2017 ).
The h-index, or Hirsch index, measures the impact of a particular scientist rather than a journal ( Michael Schreiber, 2008).
h-index is based on the set of the researchers most cited papers and the number of citations that they have received in other publications. i-10-index is the number of publications with at least 10 citations.
h-index measures the impact of a particular researcher rather than a journal, so h-index is better.
I think both the h index and the total citation number should be taken into account when evaluating the impact that a researcher has on his or her field of expertise