The purpose is to produce light weight concrete in the lab for research purpose. Pl give your suggestion. I would prefer natural light weight aggregate.
I normally recommend saw dust or say rice husk as natural light weight aggregate. It will give better results.
Environmental engineering point of view, you should use artificial light weight aggregate. Fly ash should be used as India is facing problem of disposal of fly ash generated by thermal power station tremendously.
By using such sintered fly ash, concrete of density 1900kg/m3 can be obtained.
I normally recommend saw dust or say rice husk as natural light weight aggregate. It will give better results.
Environmental engineering point of view, you should use artificial light weight aggregate. Fly ash should be used as India is facing problem of disposal of fly ash generated by thermal power station tremendously.
By using such sintered fly ash, concrete of density 1900kg/m3 can be obtained.
There are many types of lightweight aggregates; natural and artificial and the selection depends on their availability, cost and type of structure.
Some chemicals can be used to create voids inside the concrete mass, no fine concrete is another example of lightweight concrete, and natural lightweight aggregate like Pumice, Lica, ....etc. can be used to produce lightweight concrete.
Back in the 1960's, BRE experimented with both fly ash and lightweight expanded clay aggregate (LECA). I believe E.R.Skoyles wrote several papers on the economics of lightweight concrete which should be obtainable.
Lightweight aggregate concrete can be produced using a variety of lightweight aggregates.Lightweight aggregates originate from either: Natural materials, like volcanic pumice. The thermal treatment of natural raw materials like clay, slate or shale i.e. Leca. Manufacture from industrial by-products such as fly ash, i.e. Lytag.