I am going to analyze the content and design of approximately 150 organizational websites. What would be an ideal number of coders and what is the best method to ensure their consistency?
Check this RG link for possible answers or further information for your question:
https://www.researchgate.net/search.Search.html?type=publication&query=best%20method%20for%20calculating%20intercoder%20reliability%20in%20media%20content%20analysis&tabViewId=57d09284b0366dfd90432d91&previous=researcher
Best regards,
Debra
Apparently, 'questions' and 'answers' count heavily in claculating Researchgate (RG) score. It does not seem very 'academic' that arbitrary questions/answers from vanity 'scholars' get points while journals that require authors to undergo extensive and challenging peer reviews process (which can take years, as the higher impact journals tend to be very selective), according to RG, 'don't provide a reliable indication of the quality of any individual article or researcher published in the journal'. In other words, I am a bit worried about the quality of RG score.
Also, if I compare RG statistics for my citations and H-score to that of Google scholar, for example, they are largely inacurate (for example, citations discrepancy is more than 300 citations that do not appear in RG)
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Academic Journals