I don't think this is a good idea.

Will you please explain that why you will not recommend?

 I will explain. 

Ms Pyali Chatterjee, please no offense.

This is a very dangerous topic to bring up in my opinion.  

Universal Ethical rules does not let gender discrimination, any discrimination of humans. 

I am very much sorry to hear about such a project after so many years the person you have mentioned  died, since most of his theories on that book has proven otherwise.

Gender preferation of parents can not be accepted as a reason for selective abortion of certain gendered babies, whether male or female.  

Gender selection is  not acceptable for anybody. 

I don' t care about any cultural explanations.  

This is unethical and unacceptable.

There are countries on the world that could put somebody in jail just for mentioning this.  This is very bad. It is unacceptable as racism. 

Even such a question should not be asked to people. 

In my opinion, and I believe many would support me, one should not choose to be a parent if she/he discriminates a child because of gender.  If anyone does that, they need professional help in their lives. 

It would be a very big mistake if any ethical council favors such a research project, or even if it is a question in a questionnaire type of research.

 And if a doctor does gender based induced abortion, this is not ethical and  it is a crime. 

Please try to forget about this topic as soon as possible.  

Hi Pyali,

Sex selective abortion as a means of population control would be problematic for a number of reasons. If the idea is to present this option in response to the study's reported high Afghan refugee birth rate, their resistance to family planning, and preference for male children over female, one problem would be repeated surgical risk to the women. This is magnified with Afghani desire to have larger families and letting god decide on their family size, which may subject women to numerous abortions, at a cost the state of Iran would have to bear.

This religious/cultural component may also simply prevent abortion from being a valid option because of a resistance to contraception and letting god decide on granting life and death, similar to many Christian views that abortion is killing a child granted by god and that humans  do not have that right. This scheme would also not be in concert with Iran's effort to promote the equality  of male and female children and plays directly against the effort and expense expended in promoting this more normalized view of the sexes. 

The long term consequences of this policy are also unknown. Tinkering with the male/female ratio in favor of a high male ratio may generate problems relating to available jobs and  available females for spouses, higher crime rates, as well as an increased devaluation of women.

The view of one gender being more valued than another is a backward notion that should not be promoted. It's likely that some abortions in some countries are already performed based on gender selection but that is a personal, though albeit arguably uninformed, choice based on a cultural and/or belief construct not a governmental or health care policy.  For an NGO or government to promote such a policy is to support discrimination and ignorance.

 Hi Pyali,

Thanks for your question, abortion is not a family planning method and as such would not be accepted as a population control method. So Sex selective abortion is not an acceptable population control Method, its a form of genocide against the unborn and the future. Both sexes plays significant roles in the development of nations and no particular type of sex can be term less than the other.

Those who promote this are only looking for means of offering blood sacrifice which they need to gain ascendance in their occult  fora. 

It is wickedness against humanity and sin against God