Taking into account the growing emission of greenhouse gases, the ever-increasing global warming process, growing environmental pollution, reduction of green areas, including natural forest ecosystems etc., the importance of implementing the green economy concept and the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development to economic policies in individual countries is increasing. However, from year to year, there is less and less time to implement the necessary proecological reforms, such as the development of energy based on renewable energy sources, development of electromobility, improvement of recycling techniques, waste segregation, reclamation of degraded environment, economical consumption of clean water and other resources obtained from the earth's crust , implementation of eco-innovations, etc.
In connection with the above, the question arises when these proecological reforms will be implemented?
When the green economy concept and the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development will be fully implemented into economic policy?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
Dear Dr. Prokopowicz:
Maybe you will find an answer in this pair of contributions of mine on your subject matter:
Critical Elements for Green Technologies – A critical review
Supplements to the presentation Critical Elements for Green Technologies – A critical review
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328278303_Critical_elements_for_green_technologies_-_A_critical_review
It is available as a powerpoint presentation added up with an explanation on the Researchgate Server as full text file.
With kind regards
H.G.Dill
Dear Dr. Prokopowicz:
Maybe you will find an answer in this pair of contributions of mine on your subject matter:
Critical Elements for Green Technologies – A critical review
Supplements to the presentation Critical Elements for Green Technologies – A critical review
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328278303_Critical_elements_for_green_technologies_-_A_critical_review
It is available as a powerpoint presentation added up with an explanation on the Researchgate Server as full text file.
With kind regards
H.G.Dill
The human economy is surely a great chronobiological organism; your future model can be achieved by applying complexity science. We are just at the beginning to scientifically switch the win/lose economy into a win/win economy, concerning ecological externalities and economic fairness. In addition to the methodical barriers in science and the economic mechanisms of wealth distribution (land, money and tax monopolies), there remains the human moral problem of ethical rectifications, in terms of B.Spinoza or D.Hume.
The answer to your question is simply yes. A model of this kind is elaborate, but in a sense initially indirect in terms of measurement. I have highlighted a system of equations modeling economic growth, CO2 emissions and income inequality with other equations to take into account the different spheres of sustainable development.
In Buntland's (1987) report, the concept is defined as a development that satisfies both present and future needs. The question of the quality of the environment and the preservation of it is subject to antropic activity. As a result of first results between the theory and the empirical side, various points diverge. The case of catching up emissions by increasing growth of economic activities is not true in the analyzes. As a result, new strategies for good control of energy need to be adopted. Because the need being the core, the main reason that push to produce more. All production, on the other hand, uses excessive energies. geopolitics, geo-economics around the world illustrate the animosity of large countries to bypass the sovereigns of the small states for their energy needs and to meet the demand of their countries on illusory pretexts.
Once again, income inequality, which has a lot to do with economic growth, is another dimension of sustainable development. The alternative that stands to counter is the income tax.
In the different possible areas of analysis, energy is an important and unavoidable part of the transition to sustainable development. From this point of view, the adoption of a new model of energy dependence would be necessary to circumvent climate change that is felt almost everywhere in the world with deplorable and worrying effects when we look at the number of victims of different species including the man.
The increasingly complex nature of agri-business has necessitated the use of a systemic research approach in solving operational problems which integrates economics, policy, environment, and social in modelling. The systems thinking approach is a new concept for sustainable management, and its application to sustainability management and governance is yet to be exploited by many nations, researchers, managers and policy makers globally. Agricultural sustainability may benefit from a systemic approach to interventions and capacity building, based on systems thinking and complexity management to address challenges holistically and deliver the desirable sustainable outcomes.
Only by increasing our appreciation for the growing “systemic approach” that meets the needs of the present while safeguarding earth’s life-support system, on which the welfare of current and future generations depend, can we begin to function as responsible web-mates, and can our social institutions (from families, to corporations to governments) achieve some modicum of control effectiveness and stability.
Yes. But we need to take some strong decisions besides spreading awareness to the common people through personnel contacts, various media etc. to make it a real success.
The above discussion inspired me to the following considerations: In my opinion, sustainable pro-ecological economic development should be an important determinant of shaping economic policy. Do you agree with my opinion? For many centuries, the economies of countries and enterprises have developed without knowing or ignoring the principles of sustainable pro-ecological development. On the other hand, in the 21st century the realities have changed, the global warming process is accelerating and if the reforms of pro-ecological changes, development of renewable energy, recycling development, development of environmental protection etc. are not implemented, in the short term the global warming process will become an irreversible process and at the end of the 21st century the planet Earth, humanity and many other forms of life on Earth are threatened by climatic extermination due to the high rise of negative anomalies and climatic cataclysms. Sustainable pro-ecological economic development, now and in the future, can not be ignored further, it can not be considered a myth. Economics must change towards the concept of green economy. The economic policies of states should also change in such a way as to activate for the development of ecological innovations and support the processes of sustainable pro-ecological development. Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion. Best wishes
In many countries, the necessary proecological reforms are already being implemented, but the scale of these activities and the funds allocated for these purposes are still very limited. And time is getting less. The global warmin process is probably progressing faster and can significantly accelerate in the 21st century.
What do you think about this topic?
What's your opinion on this topic?
Do you agree with me on the above matter?
Please reply
I invite you to the discussion
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Ecology