The stress i am getting is 7MPa. the actual stress value from the paper is 350MPa. All the material property, boundary conditions, loading and mesh sizes are same as given in the journal paper. There is no error and the analysis is ran successfully with some warnings shown below.
For *tie pair (assembly_m_surf-1-assembly_s_surf-1), not all the nodes that have been adjusted were printed. Specify *preprint,model=yes for complete printout.
442 nodes have been adjusted. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeAdjust.
For *tie pair (assembly_m_surf-3-assembly_s_surf-3), not all the nodes that have been adjusted were printed. Specify *preprint,model=yes for complete printout.
442 nodes have been adjusted. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeAdjust.
For *tie pair (assembly_m_surf-5-assembly_s_surf-5), not all the nodes that have been adjusted were printed. Specify *preprint,model=yes for complete printout.
442 nodes have been adjusted. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeAdjust.
For *tie pair (assembly_m_surf-7-assembly_s_surf-7), not all the nodes that have been adjusted were printed. Specify *preprint,model=yes for complete printout.
442 nodes have been adjusted. The nodes have been identified in node set WarnNodeAdjust.
576 elements are distorted. Either the isoparametric angles are out of the suggested limits or the triangular or tetrahedral quality measure is bad. The elements have been identified in element set WarnElemDistorted.
Can anyone help me resolve the issue.
The discrepancy between the stress results in your Abaqus model (7 MPa) and the expected value from the paper (350 MPa) could be due to several factors, even with matching material properties, boundary conditions, loading, and mesh sizes. Key areas to review include:
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Statistics