The temperance of permanence defines just means in time, given the rate of assumption x the matter of existence + reasons for considering = EVOL 2nd Order Reasoning
The day we can answer that question objectively, the human condition will be lost.
I could list many things: coincidence between tastes, expectations and objectives, commitment, interest, mutual benefit, money, fear, pity, the feeling of revenge... etc., but with certainty, depending on the people studied, these will vary or new reasons will appear.
It is a question that has its roots in philosophy and not necessarily in science.
my immediate reaction is to dispute. isn't that funny? we agree with each other, yet I "choose" to be alone philosophically. does this interest science?
ERES Human Definitions System seeks to answer a question in the future, when we are more "mature" as a species. the intent is to "look again" when 1000 years has passed (following the moment of my passing). you are welcome to associate your energy any way you wish. however, always be aware of the intricacies of words when mixed with those of others. which = witch ... and there is no substitute for what "nobody" can produce ~
It seems rhetorical: Does the question center on microsociological/ macrosociological or microeconomic/macroeconomic considerations? I think each of the above has a different kind of components to describe what ties people together. In other words, as far as human nature, is there anything like permanence with the exception of change?
Murtala, i understand your concern, however at the root of sustainability is the answer to this question, no? S = ? Whatever this is, = Human Performance Enhancement #EVOL