I am designing a faculty training program I thought of workshops on: teaching methodologies, policy and regulations, research and support, ethics. What other elements do you think a faculty training programs should include?
Some experience from US! "The American Association of Higher Education (AAHE) has defined faculty development as the theory/practice of facilitating improved faculty performance in a variety of domains including institutional, intellectual, personal, social, and pedagogical."
--Topics of general interest related to development in academics globally including new technologies like black board, etc.
--Relevant sessions on professional academic ethics, including dignity of discourse
--Some sessions on behavioral competencies so that people can change mindsets to do collaborative academic work e.g. developing patience, tolerance, control of anger
--Gen Y, and its changing expectations about the learning content and methodology
--How to write research papers, apply for grants, and where to get the requisite support
--How to publish papers in reputed journals, and what precaution to be taken
--Advanced developments in the area of the faculty through leading experts: This should have maximum number of sessions
Some experience from US! "The American Association of Higher Education (AAHE) has defined faculty development as the theory/practice of facilitating improved faculty performance in a variety of domains including institutional, intellectual, personal, social, and pedagogical."
In addition to the points you all indicated, the essentials of why and how interdisciplinary and cooperative teaching with faculty members of experience might as well be important.
I would add Philosophy of Sciences (General Philosophy shared by all science disciplines and Specialized Philosophy that applies to one science discipline). What is the Philosophy of Education?
Dear Nelson, Mohi and Mohammad et al. . Very insightful threads. They can be highly inspiring to all but still more to especially the young faculty members who have joined or are about to join the academic profession, and who have willingness to learn and improve their research, teaching and scholarly competencies.
I think colleagues above came with lots to fill in your program and they are all very thoughtful ideas and can enrich any training. However, as the trainee are all highly intellectual people (even the young ones) I recommend that such events be a two way and interactive program; i.e. the participants should interchange roles and any one should be able to share his experience in teaching/research/grants/...etc with the others. Having some invited/internals renown moderators/speakers can enhance this as well. Thanks. @AlDmour.
To the extent that you can, please cater for some inter-disciplinary exposure. In the world of today no particular science/arts stream can consider itself complete without basic understanding of what other related sciences/arts are about. Like for example, to teach economics, a basic exposure to history and social behavior is essential. Even pure sciences today are considered useful to the extent that they are socially relevant and productive. So, exposure to relevant social sciences for technical/management teachers and vice a versa may be considered.
I think that something of specifically related to the different addresses of single scohhols need to be added as well as the affinity and interactions with other disciplines are necessary. An example may be to help the future lawyers to understand the definition of "medical error" in order to avoid lengthy and unnecessary legal procedures. On the other hand the same problem should be treated in medical scohols in oreder to know all the procedures which may guide medical pratice without risks of "errorrs". The problem is becoming increasingly topical and burning in industrialized countries so that lawyers put into practice a kind of "hunting error" and many physicians now practicing exclusively a "defensive medicine." All in a very empirical.way!
I training HE staff, use a variety of methods that they are supposed to use later with their students (interactive lectures, group work, discussions pro-con, simulations, role play, LTD on the basis of readings.., problem based learning...). Explain why you use those methods, encourage them to analyse their experience and plan how can they use those methods or their varieties. Use microteaching with video feedback and peer visits to classes.
Thank you all some great ideas. I plan to make a list and circulate among the faculty to choose the sessions they prefer. I will also ask for trainers/facilitators and may be this grow to be more than a simple training program.
I am regularly called for conducting HRM programmes during the Faculty Development Programme (FDP) conducted both in the University of Madras & NITTTR.....The participant teachers (Lecturers / Asst.Professors) would be sitting tight frozen and watch the session for first 15 minutes (and will test the faculty teaching them).... the faculty should quickly ice-break...only upon that the session would get the gell...