Many papers use a larger proportion of non-adopters as compared to adopters for adoption studies. However, there is no common logic among these papers in the proportion of adoptors and non-adoptors.
Moreover, many papers identify adopters and non-adopters after calculating the adoption index. Is it logical?
Generally, what should be the proportion of adopters and non-adopters for the adoption study?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Zero
More Dirriba Mengistu's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions