Dear Mirko,

Thanks for your answer. My question is more focused on two main ideas: on one hand, the opinion about the suitability, difficulties, pros and cons behind the integration of LCA outputs in energy systems optimisation models (such as TIMES or LEAP-OSEMOSYS, for instance). This performance could result in a new portfolio of outcomes, in particular for the LCA modellers, regarding the field of the dynamic LCA approach (in this case, so to speak, explorative LCA). So, thanks for your answer (good to see that someone perceives the potentiality). On the other hand, it would be very interesting more light concerning the technicalities behind the hybridisation among methodologies (double countings, technological harmonisations, etc.).

Regards,

Diego

Good point. 

We´ll keep in touch about this issue of hybridising models, I´m very sure. ;)

The potential of integration of LCSA indicators within different energy systems modelling frameworks depends also on the context it is used. In case of interactive energy planning like  in cities and territories the indicators are defined not only by modeler or analyst but by other planning participants like city planner or administration. See more discussion about that and how to define key performance indicators in

Mirakyan A, De Guio R (2014) A methodology in innovative support of the integrated energy planning preparation and orientation phase. Energy 78 (0):916-927. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.10.089

Good luck!