Dear RG community,
The Danish Bulkhead Regulation (DIF 1926) cited by Hansen (1953) specified that the parabolic pressure relief (q) of the empirical pressure distribution for sheet-pile design was given by Eq. 1. However, Stroyer (1928) presented a draft of the DIF (1926) in which q was given by Eq. 2 (see attached file).
A curious fact is that most of the literature has stated that DIF (1926) follows Eq. 2, but DIF (1937) specifies the opposite as it uses Eq. 1. The uncertainty (dilemma) about which equation DIF (1926) used is significant for design purposes.
Did DIF (1926) specify Eq. 1 or 2?
References: