That's a good question

MINT waere fuer Stereotypen Beantwortung, also kein Aspekt.

Eine Moeglichkeit waere, um Prozessfaehigkeit zu testen - kognitive Aufgaben, welche das 2. Thema beinhalten. Naturwissenschaft ist ein interessantes Thema, besonders in der Sekundarstufe. Online wuerde sich ein multiple j. Test anbieten.

For an all-encompassing test of deep appreciation and ability to use the scientific process you might use Piagetian Formal Operations tasks, like the famous Pendulum Task (link to downloadable simulator below). Just limit your participants to those who haven’t learned the specific facts (usually toward the end of 12th grade Physics). From this task you can see how well students imagine possible hypotheses and plan out systematically testing the possibilities. For specific factual laboratory skills, you might design a battery of multiple-choice questions with one for each skill (e.g., read the level of this graduated cylinder with the correct answer and common mistakes). Hope this helps some, Ruchi. ~ Kevin

https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/pendulum-lab

Good Answer Kevin Grobman

Thanks a ton Kevin Grobman.....will go through the link too.....i am sure it will be helpful.....It will be great if you can suggest some standardised (integrated or basic)science process skill test used by researchers for middle school (9th grade). I will then alter it our school conditions.

Glad it could help!  I’ve run studies with Piagetian Formal Operations tasks (in person) and the data can be messy, though probably the most meaningful measure of scientific reasoning.  I’ve also used multiple-choice versions which are probably easier for mass data collection online even if less detailed.  For those measures, you might try looking up “Control of Variables Strategy.”  Below is a link to a meta-analysis of these measures and a review paper with specific science concept inventories.  Best wishes with your study, Ruchi! ~ Kevin

Review of Science Concept Measures (by Field):

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300823945

Control of Variables Strategy (meta-analysis):

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288630127

Multiple joice Test - das habe ich in meiner Antwort angefuehrt. Es sind auch verschiede Dinge so abpruefbar - zB: wie Problemloesen aus Kognitive Prozesse - Fertig, 2015 Kap 8, oder auch perfekt die Tests von Piaget, Pendel Aufgabe; Berge usw

Check to see if RTOP is open access. It was develop to evaluate reformed teaching in high school sciences. A part addresses students' science process skill.

Warming: Since your context is different, non-Western vs Western, I hope you intend to re-validate those "standardized test" following rigorous and ethical practice? Else, your findings will only reiterate Western knowledge base and not have any potential for your context. Your research should distinctly have potential to benefit/relevant to your context and at the same time contribute to global scholarship. Researchers are usually been trained to and try to achieve the later, leading to mismatch in theory, practice , and claims/intervention.

Following

Good answer

Matthew Odebiyi

Following

I agree with Eva Perl

Dear Kevin Grobman

Good contribution

http://www.longwood.edu/cleanva/images/sec6.processskills.pdf

Ruchi Vasudev, Nice Contribution.

Thankyou Matthew Odebiyi....Your inputs will be helpful...definitely has to be in our context.