The impact factor (IF) is a measure of the frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year. It is used to measure the importance or rank of a journal by calculating the times it's articles are cited.
So I don't get why people trained as scientists believe in this IF bullshit. They seem happy to prostrate themselves to the IF religion, against all reason. Well maybe I can see why, because it strokes scientists egos and we exist in some kind of scientific meritocracy where bean-counting decides worth, promotion, etc ... But how does it make sense to send a manuscript to a journal such as "Gloss" with an inflated high IF where no one knows of your work and probably all submissions are lured in by a high IF; as opposed to sending it to a journal where the readership knows your work and is interested in it, and the paper will get cited over 100 times?