International Code of Botanical Nomenclature
additionally, this should answer your question
- Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF, Eriksson OE, et al. (May 2007). "A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. Mycological Research. 111 (Pt 5): 509–47
- Hibbett, David S., and John W. Taylor. "Fungal systematics: is a new age of enlightenment at hand?." Nature Reviews Microbiology 11.2 (2013): 129.
- Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th Edition 10th Edition, Kindle Edition by P.M. Kirk (Author, Editor), P.F. Cannon (Author, Editor), D.W. Minter (Author, Editor), J.A. Stalpers (Author, Editor)
One of the latest that I know is: HIBBETT DS et al. 2007. A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi Mycological Research 111 (2007) 509–547.
However, the zygomycetes were recently re-evaluated: SPATAFORA JW. 2016. A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia, 108(5), 2016, pp. 1028–1046. DOI: 10.3852/16-042
Dear Prof. Yehia Mahmoud
I advise to have a look to the following reference that include
thorough phylogenetic classification of the Kingdom Fungi with more recent molecular phylogenetic analyses references. Good luck
Jawad
This was a good one! Shame that fungal classification goes out of fashion so quickly ;-)
I coincided with Dr. Jawad K. Abood Al-Janabi, we cited the same paper. It is a very complete work, thanks
The Mycota. Vol. 7. Systematics and Evolution — latest taxonomy of Fungi
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-55318-9
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-46011-5
Dear Mr Yenia
I agree with Jawad recommendation, it is a good reference.The groups were reevaluated and others were given the phyllum category.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Biota
- Eukaryota
- Fungi