This isn't Acremonium. Clearly you have polyblastic conidiogeneous cells and also ramoconidia. Could you give more information (substrata, size of conidia, ...). Even so, molecular analysis is the best way to solve the issue.
The morphology definitely suggests a member of Acremonium, in its broad sense. However, there are many genera which look similar to Acremonium (see Seifert K, Morgan-Jones G, Gams W, Kendrick B. 2011. The genera of hyphomycetes. CBS Biodiversity Series 9), and the best way to determine genus and species identity is to obtain DNA sequences and compare them with those available at GenBank. It is advisable to start sequencing the ITS region to identify up to species or species complex level, and then to sequence protein-coding loci if necessary.
Some literature which might be helpful: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3065988/
You can also see this book "Seifert K, Morgan-Jones G, Gams W, Kendrick B. 2011. The Genera of Hyphomycetes. CBS Biodiversity Series no. 9: 1–997. CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands ".
In my writings on Acremonium, I clearly warn everyone not to try to identify these species morphologically (except S. kiliense, A. camptosporum). It cannot be done at any scientific level of assurance. "Acremonium strictum" in particular is a notorious grab-bag that was used for dozens of species. Sequence, sequence, sequence. It does take some time, but you will find that the delay is well worthwhile. These photos don't look familiar to me; the one apparent instance of polyphialidic proliferation tends to suggest the Plectosphaerella clade. But anything is possible.