05 June 2021 14 7K Report

It seems to be taken for granted that high fruit and vegetable consumption is good for you, what is the underlying observational evidence?

I am aware that vitamins exist, but it is hard to actually find vitamin deficiencies in developed countries.

It's not that I am skeptical of everything. There are many things I have been convinced of with a cursory look at the scientific literature; For example:

1. Vegetable consumption correlates positively with higher socioeconomic factors.

2. Higher socioeconomic factors correlate with better health outcomes.

3. Better health outcomes correlate with socioeconomic status regardless of access to health care (Whitehall)

4. Stress causes poor health

5. Lower socioeconomic cohorts likely have higher stress levels.

6. Debt is strongly correlated with heart attacks.

All of this suggests that Fruit and Vegetable consumption would correlate with good health regardless.

Every time I have brushed up against this question tangentially by accident, I have found evidence against Vegetable's status. When I wanted to know about fibre and mortality I found a large study that showed that whole grain fibre but not vegetable fibre consumption was correlated with lower mortality rates. It does seem reasonable to assume vegetable fibre consumption would be highly correlated with vegetable consumption. Another study on mice that looked at supplemental potassium found effects on blood pressure and mortality, and concluded that any benefit of vegetable consumption could simply be due to potassium that could easily be found elsewhere.

Now that I have turned my inquiry to this question more directly I am relatively unimpressed with what I can find.

Similar questions and discussions