ما هو الفرق بين البحث العلمي في الدول المتقدمة والدول النامية؟
In my view, the difference between scientific research in developing and developed countries is due to two reasons:
1 - The proportion of expenditure on scientific research to GDP is higher in developed countries compared to developing countries.
2 - Linking scientific research to the needs of society and the problems of industry in developed countries, while scientific research in developing countries is often limited to theoretical studies away from the need of society.
Actually well developed country has already a standard Research & Technology set up ,the Journals are well indexed and internationally reputed but in developing country a standard research environment need to be set up with respect to laboratory infrastructure , technology and journal status also . It is a general concept but it is the factor just time which will change a developing country to a developed country .
I think the difference could be in topics also and addition to resources.
Apart from the insightful responses above, I think that, in general, developed countries are characterized by better facilities for research, in comparison to developing countries.
الفرق ان البحث الاول في دول متقدمة والبحث الآخر في دول ميتة في طريقها نحو النمو .
بحوث بدون دعم معنوي ومالي
In Developed Countries the literacy rate is high, but in Developing Countries illiteracy rate is high . The basic physical (measurable, in quantitative terms ) difference is the access and use of energy resources and systems.
There is a lack of wise planning in developing countries! Things can improve through improving the relative status of scientists, choosing rational and useful research projects, removing unnecessary bureaucracy and making the importation of scientific material easier.
What can be done to close the gap?
The following article Vose and Cervellini entitled "Problems of scientific research in developing" tries to answer it.
Vose and Cervellini (2016). Problems of scientific research in developing, IAEA BULLETIN, VOL.25, No. 2 , pp. 37-40.
There is no difference, because all of us follow the same rules and use similar lab. equipment.
The only limited factor is the researcher himself.
We ought to improve our skills.
I agree with them who think that main difference in resources. And, I would like to add, because of this in ways of problem's formulating. The scholars with limited budgets for their projects try to identify research topics differently. In some cases limited resources have negative impact on quality of the research, however, sometimes this very fact (limited budget) cause more sophisticated analysis.
جميل هذا التساؤل، البحث العلمي في الدول المتقدمة هو بحث علمي يتبع المصادر الأصلية مع الإبداع والإختراع، لغاية واحدة عندهم وهو حب العلم من أجل العلم، أما البحث في الدول النامية أو متوسطة التفكير، كونها مرتبطة مع عوالم اللاهوت والغيب، فهو بحث علمي يتبع بحوث الدول المتقدمة وما توصلوا له، ولغاية واحدة هو حب العلم الجاهز من أجل المظاهر الشخصية، وعسى أن نتقدم
Research environment: laboratory, equipment, sufficient quality hands, availability of grant, standard of library, make a lot of differences
1. Developed countries deliver original and quality research and implement on ground for betterment of mankind.
2. Developing countries via reinforcement of scientific ideology of developed countries deliver quantitative research and uplift society for betterment of mankind.
3. Qualitative and Quantitative observations may segregate countries via scientific ideology.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Microbiology
- Scientific Research