Dear one & all Kindly give the details for the similarities and difference between Article, Communication, Notes, Reports, Full paper, Featured Article, Perspectives, Review, & Tutorial ... How to select the suit one? What are the criteria for this? Most us select on the basis of length our findings; and present and previous work summery. This discussion is seems to be very simple.... but it is always better if we get an better idea of each one... May be it will help for research beginners..
The journals generally make distinctions.
Reviews and perspectives generally summarize previous published work.
For an example, see: https://pubs.acs.org/paragonplus/submission/jacsat/jacsat_authguide.pdf
As far as my knowledge, account is mainly discussed about our own work with minor amount of others also. If the content and length of the present work presented in article, full papers, communication and notes. Review deals with previous work in our field along with our previous work. Tutorial and perspective is also a short review type. If any mistakes in my observation please correct me..
I agree with Baker. Orginality and length are the factors which depend on the classification. The outlook of the research is the main factor.But, the review process is not a big factor for the difference. Because most of the above mentioned items undergo peer review process.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publication