A mixed-method approach is ideal. Quantitatively, you can use standardized tools like the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) or the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) alongside scales measuring work-family conflict and organizational stress. Qualitatively, semi-structured interviews help capture personal insights. This combination provides both statistical reliability and contextual depth.

Naheed Bi

An effective method to measure job satisfaction among working women—while accounting for both familial and official challenges—is indeed a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative tools like the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) and Work-Family Conflict Scale provide measurable insights into satisfaction levels, time pressure, role conflict, and support structures. These instruments allow for broad data collection with statistical validity.

However, to truly understand the lived experiences behind the numbers, qualitative techniques such as in-depth interviews or focus group discussions are essential. These allow participants to share nuanced perspectives on how familial responsibilities, workplace policies, and cultural expectations shape their satisfaction. The integration of both methods ensures that the findings are not only generalizable but also grounded in real-life complexity, making them valuable for both academic understanding and policy recommendations.