https://guides.mclibrary.duke.edu/sysreview/types

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_difference_between_meta-analysis_systemic_reviews_post-hoc_analysis_and_pooled_analysis

You could start with the above and then could explore using PubMed or another search. Good luck.

Traditional reviews are based on individual opinion; can be biased and non reproducible

Systematic review and Meta-analysis are more based on machine-assisted review; no / less bias and reproducible

Please note: There is wide difference between systematic review and meta-analysis - which is completely depended upon the objective

Hi, Md Rezaul Hai Rakib, I've created a table to compare the differences, which I hope will help you understand.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2020.00011/full

Systematic reviews, unlike the narrative reviews, is a reproductive method with a minutely detailed description of search strategy, screening process and bias appraisal. Meta-analysis is a statistical method used to merge data of individual studies. The studies are merged in the light of the methodological homogeneity across them.

To find a complete description, you can refer to the Cochrane Handbook.

Best regards

Read PRISMA statement on review papers

Maybe a bit an overload but this article identifies 48 review types and also the associated information retrieval requirements.

https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12276

Sutton A, Clowes M, Preston L, Booth A. Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Info Libr J 2019;36(3):202–22.

there is a free version available at:

https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/151987/1/Revised%20HILJ%20Manuscript%20Main%20Text.docx.pdf

cheers

Traditional review is similar to LR based on a collection of studies and personal assessment. The systematic reviews and meta-analyses are more organized, run by a specific package in R, and are more specific in terms of generating output.

Traditional review usually do not follow the statistical differences among the findings, However the systemic and Meta-analysis consider the statistical value among the findings.

I've been working for some time now with meta-analysis and review. In general, the systematic review has a more careful and detailed evaluation of the study itself, which will compose the database. As for the meta-analysis, we can think of a database where we will generate new statistical conclusions on a given subject.