So, before answering let me make a comment to make the difference between Prophet and Messenger and define Religion.
Religion in general is a pact between two parties; A divine religion it is between Allah and his creatures (Human or Jin). This pact includes rules that refer to two categories: 1. Beliefs: To worship only one God: Allah (It has never been mater to reminder us that Allah is our Creator, not at all, really never !!! It has been an evidence and a tautology for everyone and never was contested before, how can it be nowadays? !!!); 2. Sharia, Practices and Facts (Words and Acts) and Rules of Worship, sometimes added value are required, depending on the context of the nation and the people concerned by this Sharia, to fix some bad practices: Magic,
non-respect of weighing , Sodomy, for instance with, Moses, Shoaib and Lot (Peace Be Upon Them).
Prophet and Messenger are both sent by Allah: A Messenger: He is sent as a reminder confirmation and supports for a previous Prophet or Messenger or at the same time together, with the same rules of both categories: no new practices and the same beliefs (the same for all the Prophets and Mesengers of 'Allah). A prophet: he is sent with new practices (Sharia) but always with the same beliefs that will never change.
That said, Jesus (PBUH) is a Prophet and not a Messenger, since he has brought new practices and rules of worship (Sharia).
All know that rejected the prophecy of Jesus and plotted to kill him: They rejected and killed the Messengers of Judaism, what about a Prophet who calls to another Sharia !!! A Prophet means new Sharia, which means, end of Judaism and place to Christianity.
The first Christians were all Jews: the reason was simple: Jesus of Nazareth was a Jew and he died on the cross as a Jew, not as a Christian. The Christians mistakenly blamed the Jews after declaring Jesus their Christos. But Jesus was condemned and executed by the Romans. And if Christians claim that God had had a son from the beginning - no matter where he came from - to whom he gave human form to take upon himself the sins of mankind, then that is a piece of Pauline theology. In any case, it is not understandable that Christians persecuted the Jews as "murderers of our Lord Christ", because - allegedly - it was the will of God - and not the guilt of the Jews, Romans or any other people - that Jesus should die on the cross. The fact is that Christians for centuries persecuted Jews persecuted us in pogroms.
It is clear that Jews wouldn't accept such reproach.
It is quite normal that the Jews neither accepted the accusation of being God's murderers, nor would they be constantly persecuted by fellow human beings who, in their faith, allegedly elevated love and charity to a principle of Christian ethics. One must add: The genocide practised against Jews in the 20th century had no primarily Christian but ethnic-rassist background; anti-Semitism also existed among non-Christian dictators.