Please see my Postings on He-4 works where I calculate its mass accurately in 3 Parity ways using 2 Theorems in Physics, satisfying 6 Constraints (Quark, QCD, Yukawa Quantum, Most Symmetrical, Most Stable and Mother Nucleus to Rest except Hydrogen) and discovering 3 new constraints (Most Strong using Vector Equilibirum Theorem, Most Efficient Packing using HCP, Thompson Problem of Distributing Charges, and Evidence of Gravity). This work took from 2008 to 2010, where I discovered He-4 and then from 2010 to 2017, it took to Geometric Model and Predict its Mass to very close unit of 3803.688 MeV/c^2 vs 3727 MeV/c^2 of Alpha Particle (I did not know this before the work).
To satisfy Gravity modeling, and Nuclear Binding Mass, I get some mass of 1901.844 MeV/c^2 Mass.
I see a few papers here:
https://inspirehep.net/literature/297201
https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2020/17/epjconf_nstar2020_01008.pdf
Article Strong Evidence for Nucleon Resonances near 1900 MeV
Dear Sunil K Srivastava to my knowledge.
Science is wrong on speed of light.
Article Title: Science is wrong on…Light & Photon
Science up to date never been observed anything inside or outside atom to call it particle such as quark... or electron .
At last, prediction and modeling is not science, because nature is not following anyone modeling..etc. .
regard to your research.
It's not a particle, any more than the energy states of hydrogen are particles, since a model of any atom describes the energy states of the atom. So it would be an energy state of the helium atom, obtained in this formalism. But why should this energy state-assuming it's correct-be of any particular interest?
The ground state energy of the helium atom is known, namely roughly -79 eV https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_atom#cite_note-:0-8 so 1.9 GeV sounds much too high for an excited state of the helium atom, whose ionization energy is, also, known, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_atom#:~:text=Helium's%20first%20ionization%20energy%20is,76311(2)%20eV, namely -24.587 eV and -54.417 eV.
So it's doubtful that the atom has an excited state at an energy of 1.9 GeV-at that energy it's fully ionized.
The nucleus is another issue and there the strong interactions are dominant.
1.9 GeV is roughly half the rest energy of the free contituents (protons and neutrons) of the nucleus, that's all.
The calculation of the properties of nuclei isn't at all trivial: https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0410.pdf, https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4277.pdf
However, the binding energies of the nuclei are of the order of MeV not GeV.
So, here, too, this doesn't seem to have anything to do with the properties of the helium nucleus.
Cf. also Article Ground-State Properties of $^{4}$He and $^{16}$O Extrapolate...
Hadronic resonances don’t have anything to do with the spectrum of the helium atom. That’s why it doesn’t make sense discussing them and the three papers mentioned don't have anything to do with the properties of either the helium atom, or its nucleus. Nor is gravity of any relevance. Therefore the statement about gravity modeling is wrong-gravity doesn't and can't contribute to the energy spectrum of atoms in general and of helium in particular.
There are other reasons to study the spectrum of the helium atom,
namely the relation to ``quantum chaos'', http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Semiclassical_theory_of_helium_atom
Wait a minute!
1900 MeV/c^2 is around 3.3778*10^-27 kg, which is around 2.01 times neutron or proton mass. So, can it be deuterium? Two neutrons without any proton or two protons do not seem that stable to me.
Is this too naive or too obvious? I don't know!
What is proton or neutron? Science did not observe them to this date, both are theory under standard modeling theory which it never been proven . Thus how did you figure it up something that never been observed? Article Intelligent Atom
That is the point. I show He-4 which is observed and made of 12 Muons and 6 Antimuons.
- Badges
- Science topic