Let me first clarify, practically no Natural farming exist because natural means no interference of human being, just like forest and also called 'Do nothing' farming. Further, as per the definition given by policy makers natural farming does not allow external input may it be non chemical. Hence what you are saying is better defined as organic or eco-friendly farming, an established term all over the world.

Yes, I agree that for good yield level sufficient inputs are required may it be organic inputs.

Further, in conservation farming except least disturbance to soil, all other practices like use of chemicals do not support soil health therefore , may not be sustainable in long term. The most serious concern with conservation agriculture is use of herbicides for weed control and that alone cause great loss to soil and biodiversity and ultimately food chain. And in that way it may be equally dangerous to intensive chemical farming.

Conservation Agriculture is 20 to 50% less labour intensive and thus contributes to reducing greenhouse gas emissions through lower energy inputs and improved nutrient use efficiency.Conservation agriculture farmers permanent soil cover and plant seeds through this layer. They may initially use inorganic fertilizers to manage weeds, especially in soils with low fertility.Several studies have reported the effectiveness of natural farming in terms of increase in production, sustainability, saving of water use, improvement in soil health and farmland ecosystem. It is considered as a cost- effective farming practices with scope for raising employment and rural development.Natural Farming is a chemical-free alias traditional farming method. It is considered as agroecology based diversified farming system which integrates crops, trees and livestock with functional biodiversity. Natural Farming aims to drastically cut down production costs by encouraging farmers to prepare essential nutrients and plant protection materials with locally available resources, thereby ending the need for external and commercial inputs like fertilizers and other chemicals.In natural farming there is no plowing, no tilting of soil and no fertilizers, and no weeding is done just the way it would be in natural ecosystems. Natural, farm-made pesticides like Dashparni ark and Neem Astra are used to control pests and diseases...

The feasibility of natural farming versus conservation agriculture from a farmer's perspective would depend on various factors such as the local ecological and social context, the farmer's goals, and their access to resources and knowledge.

Natural farming is an agricultural practice that relies on natural inputs and processes such as composting, crop rotation, and natural pest control methods, with minimal use of synthetic inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides. Natural farming seeks to create a sustainable and self-sufficient agricultural system that works in harmony with nature.

Conservation agriculture, on the other hand, is an approach to farming that focuses on maintaining soil health and minimizing soil disturbance. It involves using minimal tillage, keeping the soil covered with crops or other materials, and rotating crops to maintain soil fertility. The goal of conservation agriculture is to increase crop productivity while preserving soil health and minimizing environmental impact.

From a farmer's perspective, the feasibility of these two approaches would depend on several factors, including:

In conclusion, both natural farming and conservation agriculture can be feasible options for farmers depending on their individual circumstances and context. It is important to assess the feasibility of each approach on a case-by-case basis and to ensure that farmers have access to the resources and knowledge necessary to implement the chosen approach effectively.

Ya rightly said

Conservation agriculture is more feasible than natural farming in economic point of view fir farmer

Conservation agriculture is more feasible than natural farming

The feasibility of natural farming or conservation agriculture can vary depending on the specific circumstances and perspectives of farmers. Both approaches have their advantages and challenges, and the suitability of each method can depend on factors such as the local environment, resources availability, etc.