There are confusing opinions about the phrases; "research gap" or "knowledge gap" which are commonly used in the academic literature. How can we claim a gap, suppose related to a particular construct, or topic, when thousands of articles are published on it? Is what we claim a gap an actual gap or it is a constructed gap? 

Is context (replication) a gap?

What is a theoretical gap/contribution?

What is a methodological gap? 

What strategies may be adopted for searching and claiming gap in the research literature? 

More Sanaullah Panezai's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions