For instance, if we want to reach for the stars physically with science and technology, to climb a ladder to the stars with science and technology, and having been briefed on all of our imaginative Star Trek scenario hypotheses, are we asking the right questions about the stars if we are still having trouble getting there?
Or, are the stars actually not what science thinks they are yet something more in-line with how we formulate Star Trek, namely a type of imaginative expression of our consciousness? Could the stars be an apparition for instance, a great natural hologram?
When is a spade a spade?
The first question to ask here in the context of this question is if indeed we depend on getting to the stars as a natural requirement of expression of our species, or is it naturally beyond us if not wired already into our sentient ability by our awareness of the stars?
You: Here I present my findings that the solar system mirrors atomic systems.
Me: I should present my findings on the new nuclear model soon. This model is the same in the structure of atoms and in the whole universe.
I am concerned about your findings. I am worried that you will approach my discoveries.
This content was accompanied by a small joke. Your sacrifice, Arash
I made several tricks about how the nuclei of atoms form, without which the answer would not be possible. And it is very unlikely that anyone will know about my tricks. I am ready to cooperate with you
- Badges
- Science topic