The question is not of my specialty, but reading his article and thinking of Jesus's greatness, I think that Mustafa Akyol has written a good suggestion.

I fully share the thought of Mustafa Akyol very well expressed in his article on New York Time.

What is the trouble with Islam? Why are there so many angry Muslims in the world who loathe the West? Why do self-declared Islamic states impose harsh laws that oppress minorities, women and “apostates”? Why are there terrorists who kill in the name of Allah?

Many in the West have been asking these kinds of questions for decades. Answers have varied from claiming that there is no problem within Islam today, which is too defensive, to asserting that Islam itself is a huge problem for the world, which is unfair and prejudiced. Luckily, more informed observers offered more objective answers: The Islamic civilization, once the world’s most enlightened, has lately been going through an acute crisis with severe consequences.

One of the prominent minds of the past century, the British historian Arnold Toynbee, also pondered the crisis of Islam, in a largely forgotten 1948 essay, “Islam, the West, and the Future.” The Islamic world has been in a crisis since the 19th century, Toynbee wrote, because it was outperformed, defeated and even besieged by Western powers. Islam, a religion that has always been proud of its earthly success, was now “facing the West with her back to the wall,” causing stress, anger and turmoil among Muslims.

Toynbee, with the insight of a great historian, not only analyzed the crisis of Islam but also compared it with an older crisis of an older religion: the plight of the Jews in the face of Roman domination in the first century B.C. The Jews, too, were a monotheistic people with a high opinion of themselves, but they were defeated, conquered and culturally challenged by a foreign empire. This ordeal, Toynbee explained, bred two extreme reactions: One was “Herodianism,” which meant collaborating with Rome and imitating its ways. The other was “Zealotism,” which meant militancy against Rome and a strict adherence to Jewish law.

Religion is for man, not man for religion ...!

When I asked a question in Reserchgate about "stealing the religious meaning" and about "the relationship between globalization and the phenomenon of terrorism," my idea was to stop this problem, the problem of stealing the humanity of religion once and stealing the origin of religion in man.

In Reserchgate I also spoke to the Prophet of Islam, saying, "Religion is love." My idea was to confirm this idea.

We have like or wisdom says; (singer neighborhood does not practice) ...! In this way we point out that the first sources of religion include all that we wish to learn from Christ (and I also referred to this in a previous question on this site) ...

The problem is in the ideology of religion, Christian, Jewish or Islamic, not the problem in religion itself.

And the problem is to shed light on specific clerics to achieve that purpose ...!

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

what's Active learning ?