As a student at the beginning of the 1970s, I joined a course in a college “which was called General Education then & Cultural Studies now”. That course was compulsory for all the college students. It involved formal lectures which presented the subjects to all students enrolled in the course & less formal tutorials including small number of students in which the lectures were discussed in more detail. The lectures were presented by “few” lecturers while the tutorials were done by a “single” instructor. I liked the tutorial then more than the fast-paced lecture.
Last semester, I tried a voluntary unpaid single tutorial per week in an organic chemistry course which encompassed 3 compulsory lectures per week. At my age, the tutorial was more laborious than the lecture. The small number of students "who joined" started the tutorials with enthusiasm initially & lost interest later on upon the approach of the final exams.
Depends on the material and the teacher/professor but I would prefer tutorials. Especially when I was doing my master's degree, most of the courses were in tutorial format. There was more interaction, discussion and exchange of ideas. Therefore as a teacher I prefer tutorials although I find lecturing much easier.
My experiences slowly but surely took me away from tutorials.
Because yes, having gathered enough "strength", allowing me to built-up my own tutorials, coming out from my lectures.
In fact, those tutorials became "possible tutorials", but not mine. Considering my strengths and weaknesses, upon those knowledge I had and wanted to gather.