In a research study on the testing of Fisher's and Yates Random Numbers Table, it has been found
(1) that the absence of randomness in the Fisher & Yates Random Numbers Table can be regarded as significant not only at 5% level of significance but also at 1% level of significance when tested by frequency test based on chi-square statistic
and (2) that the absence of randomness in the Fisher & Yates Random Numbers table can be regarded as insignificant when tested by Run test based on Z statistic.
Based on these two findings, what conclusion can be drawn on the randomness of the Fisher & Yates Random Numbers table.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
More Dhritikesh Chakrabarty's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions