The integral development of children is intimately with the game. In a bibliographic review of this area of scientific knowledge (children's game): Which authors should not be omitted?
This is a very interesting topic! Childhood as a subject of interest is something relatively recent, if we consider the historical temporalities. For this reason, it is perhaps somewhat difficult to find classical authors who say something about this topic. One way forward is to explore the topic from a multidisciplinary perspective, treating childhood, toys and games within the scope of Philosophy, Sociology, History, Social Psychology, and Education. This enlargement of the theoretical base may be an extra challenge, but it may compensate by the discoveries of new approaches on childhood games. An example I can cite would be the dialogue between the History of Art and Education through childhood games, using the work of Pieter Bruegel the Elder - "Children's Games" (Vienna, Kunsthistorisches Museum). I also suggest paying attention to the distinctions between games and toys, since not every game is a toy and vice versa. About that I recommend this interesting article by Armand D'Angour [https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1016076.pdf].
"What classical authors should not be omitted from in-depth studies on children's play?" -- Reinaldo Requeiro asks.
I would add to the two authors mentioned above the name of the French philosopher Georges Henri Luquet and his book- -- Le dessin enfantin (The child's drawing).
The book 'Le Dessin Enfantin' by Georges-Henri Luquet is in open access on the University of Paris website [http://luquet-archives.univ-paris1.fr/document.php?domaine=psychologie&fichier=802&photo=ledessinenfantin-005.jpg&lg=pt].
Thank you for the sending of the link above. It allows us to access to the text of the classical book by Georges-Henri Luquet, Le dessin enfantin. Too often, J. Piaget refers to this book in his following two books: 1) le jugement moral chez l'enfant (1932). Paris: Alcan; and 2) La formation du symbole chez l'enfant (1946). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
As far as I know, neither Arnold Gesell nor Erick Erikson were concerned with children's play. It was Jean Piaget, who, in his book Le Jugement moral chez l'enfant (1932). Paris: Alcan, appealed to the "jeu des billes" to study the moral development of the child, namely the two phases of morality the was able to conceptualize: an autonomous morality, a morality based on the ideas of equality, cooperation and mutual respect, and a heteronomous morality, a morality guided by the ideas of fear, unilateral respect and blind obedience.
It has been a pleasure to participate in your thread. I keep missing some traditional games I played when I was child. Now, most of the children's games are electronic and too often are aggressive.
Erik H. Erikson Chap 2 Configurations in Play and Dreams , in " A Way of looking at things. Selected papers, , Norton and Company, 1987
Erik H. EriksonToys and Reasons,, WW.Norton &Company, 1977
William Stern Part VI Fantasy and Play in"Psychologu of Early Childhood, ", Routledge, 2018
Jean Piaget, La formation du Symbole chez l'enfant.. Imitation, Jeu (play) et reve, image et representation, Delachaux et Niestle, 1989 [there is also in English]
Mira Stambak, Hermina Sinclair, Pretend Play among 3-year Olds, Routledge, 2018, [the authors were very close collaborators of Jean Piaget]
Arnold Gesell in his 3 big books
The First Five years of Life, The Chid from Five to Ten and Infant and Child in the Culture of Today-- there are ALWAYS references to play for every year of child age.
Thanks for the information you provide. It is welcome and appreciated. I had already mentioned the book by Piaget -- La formation du symbole chez l'enfant (1946). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Olena Muzyka, I was thinking about his book but i did not find it (translations, I mean). I found however lots of references to him for explaining the origin of play. We have also in Romanian, an author explaining the magic origins of play and he is right for a part of the children games. I think nobody was able to explain the play, nor language. This is fascinating but also frustrating.
“If you want to be creative, stay in part a child, with the creativity and invention that characterizes children before they are deformed by adult society.”
"It is paradoxical that many educators and parents still differentiate between a time for learning and a time for play without seeing the vital connection between them.” -
Play has no rival in children's learning . As once O. Fred Donaldson claimed: “Children learn as they play. Most importantly, in play children learn how to learn.” -
As a child specialist I agree with Jean Pisget and Lev Vygotsky as foundational thinkers about play in children. However, the greatest theorist of the nature of play is Johan Huizinga in his Homo Ludens. We should also add child psychoanalyst Donald Winnicott’s Playing and Reality and other pioneers of play therapy. In other areas such as theology, Harvey Cox’s The Feast of Fools with the trope of Christ the Harlequin have been influential.
"Play is often talked about as if it were a relief from serious learning. But for children play is serious learning. Play is really the work of childhood."
"It is paradoxical that many educators and parents still differentiate between a time for learning and a time for play without seeing the vital connection between them.”
Make play a priority. Sometimes we have to say no to certain outings, events or activities. Family life is challenging enough but downtime, where kids can just be kids, is a necessity for child
"If you want to be creative, stay in part a child, with the creativity and invention that characterizes children before they are deformed by adult society.. Let them play"
As once the French psychologist Henry Wallon noticed, a child who does not play is a unhappy child. It is me perception that this can be applied to both adolescents and adults.
Kay Redfield Jamison is a mandatory reference on the issue of children's play. it suffices to say that once he claimed that “children need the freedom and time to play. Play is not a luxury. Play is a necessity.”
One of the best ways 'to know of people's character is to observe them when they play, namely when they lose. For example, it is relatively easily to be magnanimous when on wins; the point is to be magnanimous when ones loses.
George Bernard Shaw is a mandatory reference for the issue of play. He cogently remarked that "we don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing."
To play, namely social games, gives us an opportunity to develop, along others, meta-cognitive skills because, for example, too often we have to think about what other are thinking if we want to win a certain play. To play chess with our peers is a telling example of the idea I want to convey, the development of meta- cognitive shills in the process of playing.
Leo Buscaglia said ir well when he astutely remarked that "it is paradoxical that many educators and parents still differentiate between a time for learning and a time for play without seeing the vital connection between them.” -